We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2381
Details
Submitted by[?]: Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2381
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Hedonist Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Hedonist Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:24:09, March 29, 2007 CET | From | Communism Wow! Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2381 |
| Message | I urge everyone to vote against this bill. Such a strong RFP presence in the cabinet would allow them to reestablish KAOS, which would only strengthen their grip on Kalistan through illegal and undemocratic means. |
| Date | 06:36:52, March 29, 2007 CET | From | Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2381 |
| Message | Heh, more positions for me, then. |
| Date | 07:26:16, March 29, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2381 |
| Message | Yes, because freedom is such a grand thing to oppose |
| Date | 07:37:20, March 29, 2007 CET | From | Communism Wow! Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2381 |
| Message | Dude, much as I find doping people funny, we both know that KAOS has nothing to do with freedom |
| Date | 18:51:05, March 29, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2381 |
| Message | I just find it funny that you apparently consider me the same and CP/CK. Now that he's gone, am I next in line? BTW, I have nothing against the RP. Last time I had success in Kalistan, the cabinet power was taken away from the president. We saw the mess that caused. I try to introduce some treaties, not very restrictive ones, mind you, and the Fair Play act is put into place. THen, I get told not to do any treaties. I don't think you were here when we actually had a powerful majority of right wing and/or fascist parties. It's wasn't fun. You act as if KAOS and treaties are part of that problem, rather than a way to counter that problem. We've worked pretty hard on Kalistan, why let that go to waste when people have no willingness to RP Kalistan as Kalistan. BTW, so far the HP and the UFK have done a good job in this regard. And the comment you are referring to was IC. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 392 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 171 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 52 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made" - Otto von Bismark |