We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Technology
Details
Submitted by[?]: Falanges Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2383
Description[?]:
| it 's Facebook time!!! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The official national sport.
Old value:: Fencing
Current: Cricket (summer) and Football (winter)
Proposed: Facebooking
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:32:14, March 31, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Justicial Party - Solidarity | To | Debating the Technology |
| Message | Bebo is better. |
| Date | 23:26:41, March 31, 2007 CET | From | Luthori Tory Party | To | Debating the Technology |
| Message | Bwuh? Why, when, where, how? |
| Date | 15:38:33, April 01, 2007 CET | From | Falanges Party | To | Debating the Technology |
| Message | Don't you use facebook guys? Let's spread it in the Empire. |
| Date | 20:08:27, April 01, 2007 CET | From | Luthori Tory Party | To | Debating the Technology |
| Message | No. And it's not a very imperial sport, now is it? How about fox hunting instead? |
| Date | 20:36:19, April 01, 2007 CET | From | Imperium et Libertas Party | To | Debating the Technology |
| Message | Happy April Fool's Day to you too CDP. ;-) |
| Date | 20:45:40, April 01, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Technology |
| Message | The Defenders second the Tory's proposal to make Foxhunting the national sport. |
| Date | 01:18:59, April 02, 2007 CET | From | Imperium et Libertas Party | To | Debating the Technology |
| Message | We'd back that as well. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 17 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 125 | |||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 13 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "We must show that liberty is not merely one particular value but that it is the source and condition of most moral values. What a free society offers to the individual is much more than what he would be able to do if only he were free. We can therefore not fully appreciate the value of freedom until we know how a society of free men as a whole differs from one in which unfreedom prevails." - Friedrich August Hayek |