Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 02:23:30
Server time: 05:36:29, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2383

Details

Submitted by[?]: Centrist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2383

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:02:48, April 01, 2007 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2383
MessageThe Right is Right Party shall support this Cabinet. Whilst we are not included in it, and the beliefs of the parties are not particularly to our liking, the current coalition will just not do. The CUP has shown complete disregard for the people of this country, with their lies and confusion.

We urge all of the parties proposed for this coalition to vote in favour. We hope that we can work with you as some kind of unofficial partner.

Date23:08:36, April 01, 2007 CET
FromCentrist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2383
MessageIt has become clear in recent game years that Mr. Barnwood was not a true leader.

His administration, possibly himself, has lied to Hutori in the public discussion thread.

He has publictly stated that his ambissions were more important than justice and morality in Hutori.

His administration is apparently attempting to discredit and even impeach a former Prime Minister - which is unheard of. Corruption charges is one thing but impeach for lying when Mrs.Wright had clearly stated that her party was changing policy directions.

And Mr.Bardwood has lied in a private message to the Centrist headquaters when asked about the 'supposed' bill was replied "you'll find it." This re-assurance led to a process of analysing every bill proposed by the CUP and resulted in wasted time by me and the lied being found.

Date23:11:39, April 01, 2007 CET
FromCentrist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2383
MessageIt has become clear in recent game years that Mr. Barnwood was not a true leader.

His administration, possibly himself, has lied to Hutori in the public discussion thread.

He has publictly stated that his ambissions were more important than justice and morality in Hutori.

His administration is apparently attempting to discredit and even impeach a former Prime Minister - which is unheard of. Corruption charges is one thing but impeach for lying when Mrs.Wright had clearly stated that her party was changing policy directions.

And Mr.Bardwood has lied in a private message to the Centrist headquaters when asked about the 'supposed' bill was replied "you'll find it." This re-assurance led to a process of analysing every bill proposed by the CUP and resulted in wasted time by me and the lied being found.

Date23:12:01, April 01, 2007 CET
FromCentrist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2383
MessageThe Centrist Party aims at good governance. We also aim at integrity and honesty. We asked Mr. Barnwood to resigned. He refused. Twice. We will be willing to work with the CUP in the future but not until Mr.Barnwood quit his duties as CUP leader and be replaced by someone more ethical.

Date23:14:32, April 01, 2007 CET
FromCentrist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2383
MessageAnd by the way, this is NOT an impeachment bill. If this bill pass, Mr.Barnwood would be eligible to become Prime Minister again in the future.

Corruption charges are not out of the question however. LOL.

Date10:37:42, April 02, 2007 CET
FromConservative Union Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2383
MessageWe will not support this. We wish the current coalition to carry on as it is. To the NDP, Le Chaim and the UFD. You will not get any power because it will be sapped away by RIR and the Centrists. They just want this to pass so we and our allies the CDA are out of the equation. We aim at good governance. The elections are nearing so you probably won't get any power what so ever. We urge all to vote down this bill, it is a load of cons trying to get parties to support for cabinet positions which you will only hold for a few months. Voting it down will give you MORE power at the next election because we probably will drop a load of seats. Wait until after the next election and you will get more cabinet positions and more influence. WE URGE ALL TO VOTE THIS DOWN.

Date13:58:35, April 02, 2007 CET
FromUnited Forces of Decay
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2383
MessageIt's time for a change...

Date23:52:11, April 02, 2007 CET
FromChristian Democratic Alternative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2383
MessageThe will of the people is being systematically opposed here. The Conservative Union Party is still the largest party and has a clear mandate from the people. This hotchspotch coalition (or 'stamppotkabinet' as we Dutch would call it) has a majority, but it hardly possesses a clear mandate.

If you really support the will of the people you now will ask their advice through early elections.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 79

no
  

Total Seats: 46

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

    Random quote: "Without opposition there is no politics." - Alun Daffys, former Alorian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 74