We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Abortion: Pro Life
Details
Submitted by[?]: Industrialist Party of Aloria
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2385
Description[?]:
| Abortion needs to be in medical emergencies only. Think about it: How would you like it if you had of been aborted, you wouldn't even be alive to eat your favorite food or do your favorite things. Think of that unborn childs ability to be a happy and productive person. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Current: Abortion policies are established by local governments
Proposed: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:29:36, April 04, 2007 CET | From |   Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Abortion: Pro Life |
| Message | This seems more neo-conservative than capitalistic! CINO (Capitalists in name only?). But, why not? Now that the leftists coalition has restricted free-speech and taken away private ownership of firearms; the extreme right can ban abortion. This country has quite expediously gone from one of largely libertine virtues to the virtues of P.C. fascists. Now, we can advance the wild-eyed agendas of the clerics, rabbis, imans, priests, reverends and assorted other religious nuts! |
| Date | 00:32:59, April 05, 2007 CET | From | Industrialist Party of Aloria | To | Debating the Abortion: Pro Life |
| Message | Now what is wrong with being religious. I do believe that these unborn children are just as alive as you and I. Murder is bad isn't it? Well why shouldn't abortion be too. Besides I do support it for medical emergencies. |
| Date | 13:47:09, April 06, 2007 CET | From | Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Abortion: Pro Life |
| Message | Nothing is wrong with being religious unless you're trying to impose your religious doctrine and opinions on others -- especially via secular-government legislation. Aborting a fetus, which is not viable, is not murdering anymore than murdering cancer cells when you irradiate or cut them out (cancer cells are living too!). Furthermore, you are inviting the state into a women's personal medical decisions as well as those of the healthcare community. This opens a door for socialized medicine and government intrusion upon private medical records, diagnosis and genetic coding. So by your rationale, "killing" for medical emergencies is OK but never at anytime else? Keep religion and personal choice restricting legislation out of our legislature! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 66 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 534 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: " A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul." - George Bernard Shaw |