We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Higher Morality for the Public
Details
Submitted by[?]: Industrialist Party of Aloria
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2386
Description[?]:
| We need to ban or seriously regulate some things in the area of morality. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for everyone.
Current: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Proposed: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The time at which sexually explicit content may be shown on broadcast television (if allowed).
Old value:: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Current: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Proposed: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:04:14, April 05, 2007 CET | From | Industrialist Party of Aloria | To | Debating the Higher Morality for the Public |
| Message | Think of the children watching or looking at this stuff! Seriously, this is going to corrupt the mind of our young. It will turn them from the innocent little beings they are way too soon. |
| Date | 03:27:19, April 06, 2007 CET | From |  Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Higher Morality for the Public |
| Message | How would it corrupt them? Would "kids" even watch it? What happened to taking care of your own kids? Nobody forces you to plop them down in front of the TV set. Plus, why should people without kids have their freedom to view what they want taken-away because you chose to spawn children? This legislation is yet more government intrusion paving the way to a more restrictive country (only this time its being done by a "conservative" party whose name is ever-changing. Government has no place in entertainment! |
| Date | 04:59:59, April 07, 2007 CET | From | Industrialist Party of Aloria | To | Debating the Higher Morality for the Public |
| Message | Listen buster, kids have means of getting around their parents that are very sneaky, some I probably couldn't even dream of! |
| Date | 05:36:32, April 07, 2007 CET | From | Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Higher Morality for the Public |
| Message | And if they can get around parents, what makes you think they can't get around government regulations? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 207 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 306 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 87 |
| Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
| Random quote: "What is conservatism? Is it not the adherence to the old and tried against the new and untried?" - Abraham Lincoln |