Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5475
Next month in: 02:08:27
Server time: 13:51:32, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): JourneyJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of June 2388

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kirlawan Popular Front

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2389

Description[?]:

The Kirlawan Popular Front propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the People's Republic of Kirlawa.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:11:09, April 13, 2007 CET
FromKirlawan Popular Front
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 2388
MessageHeadlines:

Even if our preferred option for tax cuts goes through, there will still be a surplus of about 90 billion KDI. We also propose a cuts is Defence spending, Finance Dept budget and Trade and Industry to the tune of 410 billion KDI

This results in 500 billion KDI that can be re-prioritised:

200 billion to Health & Social Security
150 billion to Justice
100 billion to Internal Affairs
50 billion to Infrastructure.

We present what we believe to be a balanced budget.

Date12:45:03, April 13, 2007 CET
FromCountry Liberal Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 2388
MessageWe feel it is bizarre to suggest a cut in the defence budget. Our region is prone to conflict and it seems shortsighted to suggest a defence cut.

Date14:15:35, April 13, 2007 CET
FromKirlawan Lightning
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 2388
MessageThe Nukes are expensive. We may be able to afford the defense cuts with less of these.

Date15:41:43, April 13, 2007 CET
FromCountry Liberal Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 2388
MessageIn fairness ending conscription would enable a cut in defence spending, although we are puzzled by the Communists decision to back this budget after their plans for rearmament.

Date20:45:59, April 13, 2007 CET
FromKirlawan Popular Front
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 2388
MessageWe hope to make the region a little less prone to conflict by reducing the level of armaments here.

Date22:12:59, April 13, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 2388
MessageWe have to vote against on account of the 25% cut in defence spending. We consider this ill-advised as it will drive up levels of unemployment, hurt our regular and nuclear capabilities and leave us threatened by the revived National Progressionist movement in Dorvik and the ever-looming threat of a fascist Dundorf and Rutania.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 169

no
  

Total Seats: 124

abstain
  

Total Seats: 7


Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations.

Random quote: "Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to err." - Mahatma Gandhi

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60