We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Law against nudity
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian Democratic Alternative
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2391
Description[?]:
| As nudity degrade moral norms, the CDA considers a ban on nudity appropriate. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal and prosecuted as a civil offence.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:57:30, April 16, 2007 CET | From | "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party | To | Debating the Law against nudity |
| Message | No support... |
| Date | 14:19:31, April 16, 2007 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the Law against nudity |
| Message | No support. |
| Date | 16:26:15, April 16, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Union Party | To | Debating the Law against nudity |
| Message | Full support. |
| Date | 23:23:19, April 16, 2007 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Law against nudity |
| Message | Who decides what is moral? Why should the state have a moral outlook? It shouldn't. Hutori should be a neutral state, and not take any position on morality whatsoever. |
| Date | 14:23:09, April 17, 2007 CET | From | Christian Democratic Alternative | To | Debating the Law against nudity |
| Message | A "neutral state" is a state that is indifferent to the people living in it. A "neutral state" doesn't lend moral inspiration to people by failing to set a right example, which will make people vulnerable for crime and social exclusion. A "neutral state" is a state in which the right of the strongest prevails, as if humans are animals in the strictest sense of the word. In 5th century BC Athens Socrates detested the idea of a "neutral state" because it gave way to the right of the strongest and because it sped up the decay of Athens (as citizens had forgotten how to behave well and became decadent). |
| Date | 22:48:48, April 17, 2007 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Law against nudity |
| Message | Completely wrong. What you describe, is more of a nihilist state. A neutral state is one that cares equally about its citizens, and is blind to their personal preferences of morality, or the way in which they choose to pursue their life. And that is how it should be. It is the government that imposes morality upon its citizens that treats them as a herd of animals. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 94 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 156 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
| Random quote: "The root source of wealth is human ingenuity. This has no known bounds, so the amount of wealth in existence can always be increased. That's why capitalism is called 'making money.'" - Marc Geddes |