We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: New Military Act of 2390
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2392
Description[?]:
| Article 1: This act shall be known as the NMA Article 2.1: This act will reform the Intelligence Agency to allow for better defense of the homeland Article 2.2: This act will allow, not only for intelligence operations to take place, but for covert operations to be able to take place as well Article 3.1: The military has no business in police operations Article 3.2: This act will forbid the military from acting like police Article 3.3: This act will allow the military to be called in during a serious emergency |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency.
Old value:: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.
Current: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Proposed: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: The military acts as a de-facto police force, with powers of arrest.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:41:01, April 17, 2007 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the New Military Act of 2390 |
| Message | I guess we're opposed to nr 1, but we are supportive of nr 2 |
| Date | 19:07:20, April 17, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the New Military Act of 2390 |
| Message | What is your objection to article 1 GLDS? |
| Date | 05:09:56, April 18, 2007 CET | From | Free People's Movement | To | Debating the New Military Act of 2390 |
| Message | I... support both. Wow. |
| Date | 22:42:22, April 19, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Tukarali Democratic Party | To | Debating the New Military Act of 2390 |
| Message | We oppose number 1 as well. We support article 2 though |
| Date | 14:31:37, April 20, 2007 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the New Military Act of 2390 |
| Message | And what is the objection to #1 LTD? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 349 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 150 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "Without opposition there is no politics." - Alun Daffys, former Alorian politician |