Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5471
Next month in: 01:00:01
Server time: 02:59:58, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Arusu-Weareback | hexaus18 | ImperialLodamun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2391

Details

Submitted by[?]: Darnussian Liberal Democrat Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2391

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:33:14, April 19, 2007 CET
FromLeft Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2391
MessageWe can't support a cabinet, because the communist party is in favour a death penalty. So We can't go in a cabinet with this party.

Date12:42:47, April 19, 2007 CET
FromLeft Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2391
MessageGood. It's a great day for our Republic! Born a day without death penalty, and born a new left-wing cabinet.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 141

no
  

Total Seats: 140

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "In public policy, it matters less who has the best arguments and more who gets heard, and by whom." - Ralph Reed

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 48