Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:53:44
Server time: 20:06:15, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Defence Industry

Details

Submitted by[?]: Vereinigte Bürgerschaft Dundorfs

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2395

Description[?]:

More privatization, more competition, less costs, more jobs and less unemployment.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:06:18, April 24, 2007 CET
FromBündnis 89 / Die Faulenzer
ToDebating the Defence Industry
MessageUndecided.

Putting the argument about competition aside, our party believes that the national defense is an area in which the national government has a vested interest.

What would the government role in researching and devoloping new defensive technologies be if this legislation passed? If I understand the impacts of the proposal correctly, the government would offer to buy arms and weapons systems after a competitive bidding process?

Any insight the VBD has regarding these questions would help influence our decision.

MfG,
Gerhard Schmitt von Schmidt,
Die Faulenzer / Bündnis 74 Spokesperson for Defense

(ooc: yes, yes, I know, I spell "defense" and "center" and "favor" and "color" incorrectly; but I'm going to do my elementary school teachers proud. Oh yeah, there's another one, "elementary" school vs. "primary" school :-)

Date19:09:16, April 25, 2007 CET
FromVereinigte Bürgerschaft Dundorfs
ToDebating the Defence Industry
MessageWhat would the government role in researching and devoloping new defensive technologies be if this legislation passed?

A reserved one. It is the responsibility of the industry to invest in new hard ware. The Defence Ministry is allowed to buy military product abroad of course if the quality/price ratio is at a disappointing level.

If I understand the impacts of the proposal correctly, the government would offer to buy arms and weapons systems after a competitive bidding process?

Yes, we will use the bidding process to decide upon which offer will be awarded.

Date02:25:19, April 26, 2007 CET
FromBündnis 89 / Die Faulenzer
ToDebating the Defence Industry
MessageThe government needs to know that the military hardware it purchases are of the highest quality and technological levels.

If it can be assured that the level of quality of our armed forces will not be negatively impacted by passing this legislation, our party could potentially support the measure. In the mean time, we will have internal discussions on the matter and decide whether to support or reject the measure.

Regards...

Date06:47:57, April 26, 2007 CET
FromVereinigte Bürgerschaft Dundorfs
ToDebating the Defence Industry
MessageWe can assure the Faulenzer / Bündnis 74 that the armed forces will be kept well equipped.

Date03:09:45, April 27, 2007 CET
FromBündnis 89 / Die Faulenzer
ToDebating the Defence Industry
MessageThis bill is still difficult for the F/B74 to decide. We will continue our internal discussions on the matter and will cast a floor vote before the deadline.

Date08:45:33, April 27, 2007 CET
FromBündnis 89 / Die Faulenzer
ToDebating the Defence Industry
MessageAfter wrestling with this bill within the party, we have decided to express our opinions through a no vote, although let it be known that our advisory team was just about evenly split over which way to throw our votes.

Regards,
H. Krustofski
Vorsitzender der F/B74

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 108

no
     

Total Seats: 307

abstain
 

Total Seats: 85


Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented

Random quote: "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." - John Adams

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52