We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Government policy on nuclear power Act
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2396
Description[?]:
| We in ACP want more Nuclear Power! Thats mean we want to change a law. From: Government policy on nuclear power The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc) To: Government policy on nuclear power The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power __________________________ The voting starts in January 2396. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Current: Nuclear power plants are not permitted.
Proposed: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:51:12, April 28, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the Government policy on nuclear power Act |
| Message | We feel that with the exception to services pertaining to the public's health, safety, and education, subsidies should be the greatest distortion of the free market allowed, and that much should only be allowed for important cases. So far, we feel that the policy of nuclear power isn't quite vital enough to be considered a matter of the public's health, safety, or education. |
| Date | 03:44:38, April 28, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar Freedom Party | To | Debating the Government policy on nuclear power Act |
| Message | The TCP is quite undecided about this piece of legislation. If there are massive economic benefits, we will support, but we do not nessicarily have a qualm with government subsidies to vital industries such as nuclear power. We would like to perhaps see some more dialogue regarding the benefits of this legislation change, whether economic or other, before we can be convinced either way. |
| Date | 11:03:18, April 29, 2007 CET | From | S.C.A.F.R. | To | Debating the Government policy on nuclear power Act |
| Message | Absolutely not. This type of energy is dead. Alternative is the solution, not nuclear power. |
| Date | 16:03:25, April 29, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the Government policy on nuclear power Act |
| Message | Nuclear energy is dead? Ha, that is the biggest load of crap we've ever heard. Nuclear energy is the future of energy. No pollution. Relatively safe. Extremely efficient. It's the wet dream of every logical person. Upon until hydrogen is economically realistic in 50 years, it's guaranteed a place as one of the best types of energy. Alternative energy is wasteful and inefficient. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 570 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 80 |
| Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself. |
| Random quote: "The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire" - Voltaire |