We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Executive Privilege Act of 2397
Details
Submitted by[?]: Unio enim si quis Motus Populi
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2399
Description[?]:
| Lets get the Executive involved in forming the government, since we seem insistent on decentralizing power. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:27:00, May 02, 2007 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Executive Privilege Act of 2397 |
| Message | Shall we lay some ground rules so as not to allow an abuse of power? Proposed Amendment: The Head of Government appointed must be from the either the Head of States party if they are in the proposed coalition, or from the leading member of the coalition if the party of the Head of State is not a member of government. |
| Date | 16:50:58, May 02, 2007 CET | From | Demkratteja Lebraleiju Kundratatka | To | Debating the Executive Privilege Act of 2397 |
| Message | The HoG was made as a position for a Coalition partner to have a deputy/vice role to the Consul. We believed at the DLK that Government has exercised their powers through a coalition quite a bit in the last 2 centuries, so we saw fit that it was democratic to create a post for the Coalition partner to take a lead role with the consul but just slightly underneath them. OOC: In the Austrlian Public Service the boss of an Agency/Department is the Secretary, underneath is a Deputy Secretary, however there has been cases where there is a person appointed the role of Associate Secretary where they have powers similar to a secretary, however they are lower then the Secretary but higher then the Deputy Secretary, i hope this example eplains what this was meant when the DLK proposed this bill OOC ended |
| Date | 03:01:35, May 03, 2007 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Executive Privilege Act of 2397 |
| Message | We just want to see the Consul take a more active role in forming the government. As it stands now, a government can be forced upon our Head of State, especially in a decentralized executive. |
| Date | 00:16:18, May 05, 2007 CET | From | Alderdath Rabrati Konciralati Erradikati | To | Debating the Executive Privilege Act of 2397 |
| Message | Well, we support this /now/. But in the future this could backfire. |
| Date | 01:15:27, May 05, 2007 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Executive Privilege Act of 2397 |
| Message | We are well aware the implications should the HoS come from a party that is inactive. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 113 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 226 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password. |
| Random quote: "The trouble with practical jokes is that very often they get elected." - Will Rogers |