Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 02:22:38
Server time: 01:37:21, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): albaniansunited | hexaus18 | Neo_kami | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Return to History

Details

Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2410

Description[?]:

A return to our historical titles and names.
slogan translates as "FROM THE BEGINNING OF TIME"

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:05:07, May 14, 2007 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Return to History
MessageThe Liberty Party strongly objects to Articles 4-6, 9, and 10.
Article 4 threatens the national security of the nation and is a needless restriction on the military's ability to provide for defense and establish a Mutual Assurance of Destruction to any who threaten the nation.
Article 5 is a pointless restriction on the free market and the government's ability to increase revenue without increasing taxes.
Article 6 is a terrible step backwards in deregulation of the economy, and deeply threatens the sustained prosperity of the nation. People should not be able to retire with full benefits only half way through their lives.
Article 9 is an ABHORRENT on the face of freedom and the fact that it even appears in a bill called "Good Bye Dictatorship" is ridiculous.
Article 10 is an unneeded expansion of government control over individuals' lives.

Date07:39:24, May 23, 2007 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Return to History
MessageWe took the views of the Lib Party and made some changes to the bill.

Date07:47:26, May 23, 2007 CET
FromGerajan Peoples Party
ToDebating the Return to History
MessageInteresting... here's an article-by-article breakdown:

Article 1: Nay
Article 2: Aye
Article 3: Aye
Article 4: Nay, let's have increased democracy.
Article 5: Could support.
Article 6: I like that name... but should we bring back the Jawa?
Article 7: Nay
Article 8: Aye.
Article 9: Another good name... but should we bring back the Putera?
Article 10: Like alot... it's better than Raja.

Date23:53:03, May 24, 2007 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Return to History
MessageThe Liberty Party objects to the new Articles 2-4, 8, and strongly objects to 7.

Date16:44:04, May 26, 2007 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Return to History
MessageWith the removal of all issues, the Liberty Party fully supports this motion.

Date02:02:25, May 27, 2007 CET
FromGerajan Peoples Party
ToDebating the Return to History
MessageThe ISACON also supports the revised legislation.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 75

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements.

    Random quote: "You have to remember one thing about the will of the people: it wasn't that long ago that we were swept away by the Macarena." - Jon Stewart

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 64