Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5477
Next month in: 03:08:21
Server time: 16:51:38, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | Klexi | LC73DunMHP | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Provision for a National Health Service

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free People's Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2402

Description[?]:

Our citizens look to those like ourselves to provide them with the basic needs of life. We *must* have a National Health Service for the benefit of the Indrali people. These are the people who have made our movements a success, and yet we neglect them.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:22:07, May 08, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Democratic Party of Indrala
ToDebating the Provision for a National Health Service
MessageThe adjective is "Indralan".

Date22:25:40, May 08, 2007 CET
FromPopulist Islamic Workers' League
ToDebating the Provision for a National Health Service
MessageWe support this.

Date00:29:51, May 09, 2007 CET
FromAll-Indrala National League
ToDebating the Provision for a National Health Service
MessageWe are opposed to all but article 3. On article 1 we feel the state should subsidise the care of the poorer members of society but the proposal goes to far with state interference, we feel that the current Pharmaceutical drugs policy (article 2) is fine.

Date06:03:05, May 09, 2007 CET
FromLiberty Initiative
ToDebating the Provision for a National Health Service
MessageTwo tier health care is a genuinely bad idea. Either all or nothing, anything else compromises inefficiency and created inequality.

We prefer private health care, as we believe that charities are better suited to assisting the poor than the government. If the government steps in, charities dry up, as the charities are 1) perceived as useless to the public because the government provides this service (inefficiently) and 2) not funded, because people no longer have disposable income to spend on whatever they believe in.

The government would tax people to support this bill. Taxing is making something mandatory, even if you don't believe in it. This is oppressive.

People should support the poor if they want to, and not because they are forced to.

Thus we would oppose any changes to the current system.


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 297

no
    

Total Seats: 452

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval.

    Random quote: "Modern technology owes ecology an apology." - Alan M. Eddison

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 70