Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 02:08:36
Server time: 05:51:23, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): gattus | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Emergency Measures Act - Curfew

Details

Submitted by[?]: We Say So! Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2404

Description[?]:

In the event of a National Emergency the Government may introduce a National Curfew on all citizens.
Curfew would come into operation between the times of 20:00 - 06:00 for minors and 22:00 - 05:00 for adults.
Curfews may only be introduced at the direct consent of Government and Parliament, requiring 100% of active Government Parties to accept introduction and a minimum of 2/3rds of Parliamentary Parties.
Curfew policy would be required to be re-examined once each month whilst in operation in must be immediately repealed after the end of any National Emergency (ending National Emergency Status requires no less than 50% of Parliament to vote in favour).

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:34:19, May 12, 2007 CET
From derrfe Party
ToDebating the Emergency Measures Act - Curfew
Messagewe dissagre totally with having a curfew,it would damage the ecomony as clubs and bars couldnt operate as well which could lead to lesss music being made ,also our transport stystem would go into decline as they have less time to get customand also think about people who sleep in the daytime,they would find it hard to buy and sell things and would be poorer,and we would get less money in taxes..so we conclude that if this bill was allowed to pass it would hurt the taxpayer and the tax collecter

Date11:41:06, May 13, 2007 CET
From We Say So! Party
ToDebating the Emergency Measures Act - Curfew
MessageWe understand the concerns of our colleagues from the derrfe Party, but would point out that this would not be a standard curfew to be employed at all times but only during times of great crisis (i.e. war) and even then it requires the complete support of the entire government and 2/3rds majority in the Chamber before it could be implemented.
We maintain that this law is required to help protect our citizens in times of crisis, but is not to be employed in normal periods.

Date11:46:21, May 13, 2007 CET
From derrfe Party
ToDebating the Emergency Measures Act - Curfew
Messagebut what is our crisis,we have none

Date15:25:41, May 13, 2007 CET
From Capitalizt Party
ToDebating the Emergency Measures Act - Curfew
MessageAt the moment.

I love WSS!P way of coming up with new bill descriptions everytime.

Date19:35:24, May 13, 2007 CET
From We Say So! Party
ToDebating the Emergency Measures Act - Curfew
MessageThe bill isn't meant to introduce a curfew immediately, merely describe the situations in which a curfew can be established should we need it.

@CP: Thank you!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 203

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
 

Total Seats: 197


Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws.

Random quote: "One day our descendants will think it incredible that we paid so much attention to things like the amount of melanin in our skin or the shape of our eyes or our gender instead of the unique identities of each of us as complex human beings." - Franklin Thomas

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56