We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Emergency Measures Act - Curfew
Details
Submitted by[?]: We Say So! Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2404
Description[?]:
In the event of a National Emergency the Government may introduce a National Curfew on all citizens. Curfew would come into operation between the times of 20:00 - 06:00 for minors and 22:00 - 05:00 for adults. Curfews may only be introduced at the direct consent of Government and Parliament, requiring 100% of active Government Parties to accept introduction and a minimum of 2/3rds of Parliamentary Parties. Curfew policy would be required to be re-examined once each month whilst in operation in must be immediately repealed after the end of any National Emergency (ending National Emergency Status requires no less than 50% of Parliament to vote in favour). |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: No curfew policies may be established.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:34:19, May 12, 2007 CET | From | derrfe Party | To | Debating the Emergency Measures Act - Curfew |
Message | we dissagre totally with having a curfew,it would damage the ecomony as clubs and bars couldnt operate as well which could lead to lesss music being made ,also our transport stystem would go into decline as they have less time to get customand also think about people who sleep in the daytime,they would find it hard to buy and sell things and would be poorer,and we would get less money in taxes..so we conclude that if this bill was allowed to pass it would hurt the taxpayer and the tax collecter |
Date | 11:41:06, May 13, 2007 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Emergency Measures Act - Curfew |
Message | We understand the concerns of our colleagues from the derrfe Party, but would point out that this would not be a standard curfew to be employed at all times but only during times of great crisis (i.e. war) and even then it requires the complete support of the entire government and 2/3rds majority in the Chamber before it could be implemented. We maintain that this law is required to help protect our citizens in times of crisis, but is not to be employed in normal periods. |
Date | 11:46:21, May 13, 2007 CET | From | derrfe Party | To | Debating the Emergency Measures Act - Curfew |
Message | but what is our crisis,we have none |
Date | 15:25:41, May 13, 2007 CET | From | Capitalizt Party | To | Debating the Emergency Measures Act - Curfew |
Message | At the moment. I love WSS!P way of coming up with new bill descriptions everytime. |
Date | 19:35:24, May 13, 2007 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Emergency Measures Act - Curfew |
Message | The bill isn't meant to introduce a curfew immediately, merely describe the situations in which a curfew can be established should we need it. @CP: Thank you! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 203 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 197 |
Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
Random quote: "One day our descendants will think it incredible that we paid so much attention to things like the amount of melanin in our skin or the shape of our eyes or our gender instead of the unique identities of each of us as complex human beings." - Franklin Thomas |