Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:04:35
Server time: 19:55:24, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Zuman Independence

Details

Submitted by[?]: Zuman Independence Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2089

Description[?]:

1. Zuma is granted full independence and all Valruzian forces must be out of the nation within 48 hours.

2. An official apoligizy will be drafted and sent to the new authorities in Nuzria.

3. The Zuman Independence Party is dissolved in Valruzia but remains present in Zuma.

4. The Titoists and Zuman Independce Army operating in Valruzian areas will be given amnesty and will in return disarm.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:34:15, July 30, 2005 CET
FromDeadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageWhere is this "Zuma"?

Why should I vote yes?

Date23:41:31, July 30, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageWritten on wiki articles history and tirkalara. More extensive article with map++ coming up sometime tonight.

Date00:16:14, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageIf independence is not granted, then we will see no other option than to free ourselves. We have 50 000 men ready in Zuma and even more training.

Marshal Tintin Haxa

Date00:46:50, July 31, 2005 CET
FromDeadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageAw, i8ts just another Red Arglon-Hulbark liberation front again.

Date00:51:21, July 31, 2005 CET
FromDeadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageAre you after all of Hulbark, Arglon and Bandorra? or just some of it?

OOC: dare I even mention that when RA-HLF was still around Hulbark was apparently its own country seperate of Zuma. So would we see Hulbark attempt to gain independance from Zuma?

Date00:53:29, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageOOC: started creating this right after my first election when I got plenty votes in tirkalara. Was going to demand this earlier but then k. screwed up the maps and fled to belarus.

Date00:54:08, July 31, 2005 CET
FromRestoration Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageYou know what you'd need to do for us to support this...and you'd have to vote for it a lot!!

Date00:54:49, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageZuma is North bandorra and tirkalara but based on old maps that k. screwed up but he are to fix if he ever returns.

Date00:54:50, July 31, 2005 CET
FromDeadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageAre you after all of Hulbark, Arglon and Bandorra? or just some of it?

OOC: dare I even mention that when RA-HLF was still around Hulbark was apparently its own country seperate of Zuma. So would we see Hulbark attempt to gain independance from Zuma?

Date00:56:04, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageOOC: a map added to page ZUMA on wiki!

Date00:56:09, July 31, 2005 CET
FromDeadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageOops. didnt mean to post twice.

OOC: excuse my ignorance, but who's K?

Date00:58:25, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
Message(http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1121&start=30&mforum=particracy) the map alteration with link to old at the end

Date00:58:49, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageGo there DBP

Date00:59:23, July 31, 2005 CET
FromDeadly Buzz Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageAh, thanks

Date01:04:31, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
Messagehttp://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/wiki/index.php/Zuma

Date04:57:12, July 31, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party of Valruzia
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageNever!

Date14:34:19, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageSo you people want war?

Date16:58:07, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageOOC: you must look at the upsides if this passes the TCP/RS/SFL/ZIP will be gone!

Date18:24:08, July 31, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Liberty Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageHow would this work, in gameplay terms?

Date18:36:20, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageOOC: If it passes wouter would have to manually create this nation. Delete the my party and create a new in Zuma. And you guys would have to draft an apology for the occupation and atrocities and send to the new nation.

Date18:37:24, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageSocial Liberty on ethnic terms SLP you hypocrit!

Date22:10:43, July 31, 2005 CET
FromAlliance for Natural Law
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageWe wouldn't mind getting rid of Tikalara.
North Bandorra though, we shall not surrender.

Date22:13:43, July 31, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageNorth Bandorra is just a mostly arid place not worth a civil war. If snyone have proposals to peaceful solution please bring it forth!

Date07:52:04, August 01, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Liberty Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageWe might consider voting for this on a bit differnt terms. We do not think the Zuman Nationalists have a legitimate claim to this much land. Much of the historic "Zuma" that you are specifying has long been populated by Valruzians, and is/was Zuman only in name. If the boundary is changed to reflect this we might support it. We would also have to make arrangements for any Valruzian refugees wishing to leave Zuman territory in such a situation, as they may fear racial crimes against them.


OOC: Hope you don't mind me adding to the RP element a bit

Date07:56:19, August 01, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Liberty Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageWe would also need an agreement from the seperatists forbidding any military buildup on the Zuman-Valruzian border.

Date11:10:18, August 01, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageYes, Zidqan and the southern part of Mowqan was most brutishly colonized. There are said that over 200 000 Zumans was slaugthered to make room for the Valonians.
The only Valonians who came further into Zuma was the aristocrats sent to manage us by the Emperor.

So we will not take actions against these people if they agree to leave the land within a week.
When we are free we will not have an army we are also planning to ban Zuma from having a standing army.

OOC: Enjoy that you add rping.

Date13:35:49, August 01, 2005 CET
FromZuman Independence Party
ToDebating the Zuman Independence
MessageThe ZIP and ZIA promise to sign a peace treaty with Valruzia when our demnds have been met.

Andy Numan of the ZIP

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 54

no
       

Total Seats: 121

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Each user account may only be used by the player who set it up. Handing over an account to another player is not allowed.

    Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - Howard Zinn

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 88