We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Zuman Independence
Details
Submitted by[?]: Zuman Independence Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2089
Description[?]:
1. Zuma is granted full independence and all Valruzian forces must be out of the nation within 48 hours.
2. An official apoligizy will be drafted and sent to the new authorities in Nuzria.
3. The Zuman Independence Party is dissolved in Valruzia but remains present in Zuma.
4. The Titoists and Zuman Independce Army operating in Valruzian areas will be given amnesty and will in return disarm. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:16:14, July 31, 2005 CET |
From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | If independence is not granted, then we will see no other option than to free ourselves. We have 50 000 men ready in Zuma and even more training.
Marshal Tintin Haxa |
Date | 00:51:21, July 31, 2005 CET |
From | Deadly Buzz Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | Are you after all of Hulbark, Arglon and Bandorra? or just some of it?
OOC: dare I even mention that when RA-HLF was still around Hulbark was apparently its own country seperate of Zuma. So would we see Hulbark attempt to gain independance from Zuma? |
Date | 00:53:29, July 31, 2005 CET |
From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | OOC: started creating this right after my first election when I got plenty votes in tirkalara. Was going to demand this earlier but then k. screwed up the maps and fled to belarus. |
Date | 00:54:08, July 31, 2005 CET |
From | Restoration Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | You know what you'd need to do for us to support this...and you'd have to vote for it a lot!! |
Date | 00:54:49, July 31, 2005 CET |
From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | Zuma is North bandorra and tirkalara but based on old maps that k. screwed up but he are to fix if he ever returns. |
Date | 00:54:50, July 31, 2005 CET |
From | Deadly Buzz Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | Are you after all of Hulbark, Arglon and Bandorra? or just some of it?
OOC: dare I even mention that when RA-HLF was still around Hulbark was apparently its own country seperate of Zuma. So would we see Hulbark attempt to gain independance from Zuma? |
Date | 18:36:20, July 31, 2005 CET |
From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | OOC: If it passes wouter would have to manually create this nation. Delete the my party and create a new in Zuma. And you guys would have to draft an apology for the occupation and atrocities and send to the new nation. |
Date | 22:13:43, July 31, 2005 CET |
From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | North Bandorra is just a mostly arid place not worth a civil war. If snyone have proposals to peaceful solution please bring it forth! |
Date | 07:52:04, August 01, 2005 CET |
From | Social-Liberty Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | We might consider voting for this on a bit differnt terms. We do not think the Zuman Nationalists have a legitimate claim to this much land. Much of the historic "Zuma" that you are specifying has long been populated by Valruzians, and is/was Zuman only in name. If the boundary is changed to reflect this we might support it. We would also have to make arrangements for any Valruzian refugees wishing to leave Zuman territory in such a situation, as they may fear racial crimes against them.
OOC: Hope you don't mind me adding to the RP element a bit |
Date | 07:56:19, August 01, 2005 CET |
From | Social-Liberty Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | We would also need an agreement from the seperatists forbidding any military buildup on the Zuman-Valruzian border. |
Date | 11:10:18, August 01, 2005 CET |
From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | Yes, Zidqan and the southern part of Mowqan was most brutishly colonized. There are said that over 200 000 Zumans was slaugthered to make room for the Valonians.
The only Valonians who came further into Zuma was the aristocrats sent to manage us by the Emperor.
So we will not take actions against these people if they agree to leave the land within a week.
When we are free we will not have an army we are also planning to ban Zuma from having a standing army.
OOC: Enjoy that you add rping. |
Date | 13:35:49, August 01, 2005 CET |
From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Zuman Independence | Message | The ZIP and ZIA promise to sign a peace treaty with Valruzia when our demnds have been met.
Andy Numan of the ZIP |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 54 |
no | Total Seats: 121 |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Each user account may only be used by the player who set it up. Handing over an account to another player is not allowed. |
Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism."
- Howard Zinn |