Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 03:23:41
Server time: 08:36:18, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): New Thought | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Coalition for a Permanent Majority

Details

Submitted by[?]: Fascist Party of Rutania

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2405

Description[?]:

President Lloyd V. Douglas is pleased to announce this possible coalition between the Corporate Right Party and its two closest allies, the Grand Independent Coalition and the Commonwealth Conservative Party.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:14:24, May 16, 2007 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Coalition for a Permanent Majority
MessageWe call upon the GIC and the CCP not to cooperate with the CRP.

Date18:47:40, May 16, 2007 CET
FromFascist Party of Rutania
ToDebating the Coalition for a Permanent Majority
Message"Why? Just because you call us names does not make us any less reasonable or more dangerous."

-Krummenfather

Date18:59:43, May 16, 2007 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Coalition for a Permanent Majority
MessageWe don't call names, we have examined your policies and they come down to fascism.

Date06:20:29, May 17, 2007 CET
FromGrand Independent Coalition
ToDebating the Coalition for a Permanent Majority
MessageThough we may very well be in advantage at this proposal, I beg to disagree for the fact that I would rather see a cabinet official from every party who recieved a seat at the national assembly. Also, I would like to promote political independence.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
          

    Total Seats: 750

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "The spirit of democracy is not a mechanical thing to be adjusted by abolition of forms. It requires change of heart." - Mahatma Gandhi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 55