We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2088
Details
Submitted by[?]: Edelweiss Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2089
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Edelweiss Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the SDP
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Edelweiss Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the People's Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the SDP
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Edelweiss Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the People's Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the People's Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Edelweiss Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Edelweiss Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:12:03, August 01, 2005 CET | From | Söhne der Freiheit | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2088 |
| Message | Finally, thank you SG, but I have some issues with this cabinet: 1. SDP is always inactive, I wouldn't give him anything. 2. No offense is meant by this, but if we passed a mandate just prior to the election to right after the election have a new cabinet and you're just getting to it now, I don't think we should entrust MFA to you, as it requires constant attention of international issues. |
| Date | 11:24:32, August 01, 2005 CET | From | Edelweiss Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2088 |
| Message | CCU: Reply to 2: (real life: I've been on a vacation for 10 days, a friend of my took over the party voting (only voting), I'm back and at home for the coming 5 months, every day and I'm an addict, I know what you mean and I respect that but give me a change to prove the opposite, thank you) |
| Date | 12:22:25, August 01, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2088 |
| Message | No kind of obvious. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 148 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 124 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "I don’t have facts to back this up." - Herman Cain |