Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 01:37:01
Server time: 06:22:58, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: IP Child Pornography Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Imperialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2407

Description[?]:

Present laws would allow child pornography, and, as such, surely need to be tightened. This bill will ensure that all pornography involves adults, and not children.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:33:21, May 21, 2007 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the IP Child Pornography Act
MessageSurely there is some confusion here?

Date15:10:21, May 21, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the IP Child Pornography Act
MessageI dont see where?

Date15:11:11, May 21, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the IP Child Pornography Act
MessageAnd current laws does not allow child pornography, that was the old laws.. current laws allow pornography depicting consenting adults, as it say...

Date16:41:14, May 21, 2007 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the IP Child Pornography Act
MessageSorry, I was reading your description which suggests that the present law would allow child pornography, which is not the case, as you appear to acknowledge. However, your proposal allows children to access pornography which is surely still not acceptable

Date18:26:25, May 21, 2007 CET
FromImperialist Party
ToDebating the IP Child Pornography Act
MessageChild pornography is a form of pornography - ALL forms of pornography are legal under current law.

Further, duly note how the wording of my proposed chance - pornography DEPICTING adults is legal for everyone. This implies (ooc: because particracy makes them separate options) that under current laws, pornography depicting people other than adults is legal under our present loose laws.

Date19:29:41, May 21, 2007 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the IP Child Pornography Act
MessageI think there is some confusion here (OOC: or I'm going mad). You will see under article 1 that there are 3 lines
The first says OLD VALUE: which is the one you are talking about. but this is not the current law (I know it is confusing, I don't know why the game shows this value. this is what the law was before the last change.
The current law is under the second line which says CURRENT: and is that Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults
Your proposal is under the third line PROPOSED: and is that adult pornography is legal for everyone (including children) to view. It is actually therefore a retrograde step.
That there is no doubt that what i am saying is right can be seen here (http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=117039), which was the law proposed by the Conservative Party and passed by Congress in May 2107 which changed the law to what is currently. I remember this because we were forced to vote no to it because of the other proposal it contained on homosexuality.
So to be clear, this proposal is not necessary and is a retrograde step from what we have at present and we do not support child pornography or the ability of children to be legally able to view any form of pornography

Date19:31:01, May 21, 2007 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the IP Child Pornography Act
MessageOOC: I'm not trying to be a pain or to simply sabotage your legislation, but you genuinely do seem to have made a mistake. It is however confusing and I fully understand why you made it!

Date23:58:32, May 21, 2007 CET
FromImperialist Party
ToDebating the IP Child Pornography Act
Messageooc: I am impressed that you folks can remember that after 300 (in-game) years!

Date00:10:08, May 22, 2007 CET
FromImperialist Party
ToDebating the IP Child Pornography Act
Messageooc: oh wait that was a typo. I just need to read the bills I vote on.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 45

no
    

Total Seats: 303

abstain
   

Total Seats: 253


Random fact: Alduria, Rildanor and Lourenne all have Canrilaise (French) cultures.

Random quote: "Anarchism is not a romantic fable but the hardheaded realization, based on five thousand years of experience, that we cannot entrust the management of our lives to kings, priests, politicians, generals, and county commissioners." - Edward Abbey

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60