Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 03:17:31
Server time: 00:42:28, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Macon Development Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Macon Nationalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2408

Description[?]:

Hutori must be a leader in economic initiative here in Macon. To do so, we must unequivocally declare our support for the Union, but we must also begin the deregulation of unnecessary hurdles.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:52:55, May 22, 2007 CET
FromConservative Union Party
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
MessageNever.

Date08:58:40, May 22, 2007 CET
From"Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
MessageNo.

Date11:47:55, May 22, 2007 CET
FromUnited Forces of Decay
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
MessageWe could agree with article 1, but never with article 2.

Date11:57:45, May 22, 2007 CET
FromGod's and the King's Fighters
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
MessageNope.

Date12:50:48, May 22, 2007 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
MessageWe could agree with Article I, but NEVER Article II. Such is an insult.

Date17:04:45, May 22, 2007 CET
FromGod's and the King's Fighters
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
MessageAlthough we agree with 1,2,3 and 5, we disagree too strongly with 4.

Date17:12:12, May 22, 2007 CET
FromMacon Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
Message"This is unfortunate. We hoped we'd have a strong free market backing for our proposal to reinvigorate Hutori's economy, one that might even win over some parties to Macon nationalism once they had seen its sensible side."

-Cecilia Roberts
MNP, Chair

Date17:58:44, May 22, 2007 CET
FromChristian Democratic Alternative
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
MessageThe CDA doesn't see what your proposed motto has to do with a free market economy. The motto is reason for us to vote against.

Date19:13:32, May 22, 2007 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
MessageIt is obvious what you are trying to do here. You wish to put forward a lot of free market proposals with a unionist motto practically hidden in here, to encourage parties such as ours to vote it through. That is disgusting, and bad politics of the worst kind.

Date20:47:24, May 22, 2007 CET
FromMacon Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
Message"We thought it would be a good compromise. We still hold some hope that one or two right-wing parties will support and our omnibus compromise will pass. The motto is hardly hidden though. It says right in the description, 'To do so, we must unequivocally declare our support for the Union, but we must also begin the deregulation of unnecessary hurdles.' "

-Roberts

Date21:00:07, May 22, 2007 CET
FromConservative Union Party
ToDebating the Macon Development Act
MessageEconomic union-YES! Political union-NO!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 69

no
      

Total Seats: 152

abstain
 

Total Seats: 29


Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password.

Random quote: "The payment of taxes gives a right to protection." - James M. Wayne

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 99