Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:02:52
Server time: 20:57:07, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords

Details

Submitted by[?]: God's and the King's Fighters

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2409

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:37:17, May 24, 2007 CET
FromGod's and the King's Fighters
ToDebating the Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords
MessageAs this treaty will surely pass in the Telamon government (495 seats for it, 71 against, 35 abstain), there is no reason why we shouldn't ratify it, even if the pro-Union parties don't like it, we have to stop this silly war.

Date16:51:30, May 24, 2007 CET
FromSensible Parity
ToDebating the Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords
MessageMs. Dynamis hoped that Hutori has learned its lesson about rushing into imperfect treaties. Isn't that what got us into this mess in the first place?

Date16:57:25, May 24, 2007 CET
FromGod's and the King's Fighters
ToDebating the Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords
MessageThe treaty is just imperfect to those who still think that the late Union is still alive.

Date17:01:08, May 24, 2007 CET
FromSensible Parity
ToDebating the Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords
MessageMs. Dynamis understands that the government wants Sensible Parity's vote on this, but not Sensible Parity's input. This treaty was drafted over our objections and based on text that was shot down by parliament. Sensible Parity has been treated poorly by the government at every turn even though our support is needed for this to pass. Ms. Dynamis is beginning to wonder. . . is the government being intentionally rude to her party to trick us into voting no? Why would the government _want_ the treaty to fail? Although Sensible Parity is no longer the lead opposition party, Ms. Dynamis has issued a call for subpeonas of all government communications with defence industries and possible Telamon spies to identify why exactly the GKF-led government wants to kill the treaty.

Date18:10:54, May 24, 2007 CET
FromGod's and the King's Fighters
ToDebating the Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords
MessageThe only reason this text was shot down, was that there was one mistake in it (naval shipping). This has been corrected.
The Sensible Parity never said what else it didn't like with this treaty, but simply voted either no, or abstained. Therefore, the one Party that is killing this treaty without any reason, as we can easily understand why the Macon Nationalists are against it, is the Sensible Parity, whose "work" in this country has been nothing but destructive until now.

Date18:58:59, May 24, 2007 CET
FromConservative Union Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords
Message.Come on this silly war has been going on long enough, please don't scupper this project.

Date01:34:36, May 25, 2007 CET
FromMacon Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords
Message"We're actually considering voting for ratification. We're a perfectly sane party with Hutori's best interests at heart.

We need a promise from the government however (and we'll be asking Telamon's UCA about this as well) that the misuse of the word "nations" in the first sentence will never be misconstrued to indicate Telamon or Hutori's recognition of each other as nations in this particular document. That's all we want. A promise that these Accords are only supposed to end the war, and not grant either side recognition (or, on the other hand, deny) as being a nation."

-Cecilia Roberts
MNP, MP

Date01:34:51, May 25, 2007 CET
FromMacon Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords
Message*(should say Chair, Roberts is the Chair of the MNP)

Date10:41:59, May 25, 2007 CET
FromGod's and the King's Fighters
ToDebating the Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords
MessageIn this case, I'm afraid the text is quite clear. If the MNP still ceases to vote yes if Telamon recognises Hutori as a nation, and vice versa, there's nothing that can be done about this.

- Aurelianus Archemid, Prime Minister

Date16:24:16, May 25, 2007 CET
FromMacon Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Ihmetellä-Ferescia Accords
Message"Then the Accords will not pass and this war will not end. Blame can be laid at the feet of the obstinate opposition."

-Roberts

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 101

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 149


    Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats.

    Random quote: "Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all." - Maximilien Robespierre

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61