We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Unity Coalition for Hutori
Details
Submitted by[?]: Macon Nationalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2410
Description[?]:
| A possible coalition for Hutori's government based on those expressing interest in a new Union. |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Macon Nationalist Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Conservative Union Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Christian Democratic Alternative
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Christian Democratic Alternative
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Sensible Parity
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the God's and the King's Fighters
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Christian Democratic Alternative
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the God's and the King's Fighters
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Conservative Union Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Sensible Parity
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:28:35, May 25, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Union Party | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | We'd have to be assured that we would keep at least our economic sovereignty. We would be prepared for a new, better union, but NEVER the one currently at large. That would have to be completely scraped. We culd give this coalition ago. To those who call us treacherous, there is nothing wrong with talking, nothing at all. We talked and were offred a very good deal by the MNP which promised us economic soveriegnty and lots of power within Macon, if you had seen the terms you'dve been signing up quicker that you can say Jack Robinson. Furthermore our party shares a great deal with the MNP, our bills on religion and abortion are the same, you may call us power mad, you may call us traitors, but we support this because of the terms offered, if anyone of the terms are broken then we will withdraw our support. Until then we shall support. Also we are pleased because this coalition contains the CDA who are the closest allies of the CUP because of common policy on religion,abortion,drugs and other stuff, it also contains the GKF another party who we are quite close to and of course Le Chaim who although we lack a common aim with religion, we can work in other areas. The only main problem we have here is Sensible Parity who we accused of spying. Again we will give them a little bit of time to prove themselves. If they get too power crazed ot try to bring down Hutori in other manners we will immediately withdraw our support for this government and urge the CDA and GKF to do so too. Summarising our position, we are prepared to support this, but only because of the terms on offer and parties here who we can work with. You may call us treacherous, but soon after the new union is revealed you will know why we supported it so much. That will be all. |
| Date | 17:32:27, May 25, 2007 CET | From | God's and the King's Fighters | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | The GKF is also able to support this. We do also think, that our greatest problems would be with the SP, but we will try to work along with them. |
| Date | 17:47:24, May 25, 2007 CET | From | Sensible Parity | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | Sensible Parity is leery of this proposal. We will give it some thought. |
| Date | 18:04:44, May 25, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Union Party | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | 'Meditate on this'. |
| Date | 19:01:17, May 25, 2007 CET | From | Sensible Parity | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | Ms. Cindy Dynamis notes two things. Sensible Parity is the second largest of the parties. Sensible Parity is given a mere two cabinet positions. However, the Macon Nationalist Party reserves only one office for itself, and we are given the very important Foreign Ministry. She also understands that other parties need to time to trust our party, and to come around to the ideas we represent. We will meditate on it indeed. |
| Date | 19:19:05, May 25, 2007 CET | From | "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | We could agree. The three ministries conducted to us are exactly the three we are interested in. I'm not quite sure if we (meaning our party) can trust SP enough to agree to a coalition...Still, we would agree... |
| Date | 17:44:10, May 26, 2007 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | The CUP really don't get this at all. You simply want to retain economic sovereignty. What about our armed forces? Our foreign policy? Control over our borders? Education, health, infrastructure policies? Economic sovereignty is nothing when all of this is controlled by an external power. You are mad. And yes, you are power driven. You always say that we are, but the Right is Right Party would never agree to a coalition with the unionists until they stop their drive for ridding this Parliament of its sovereignty. You simply wish to sell Hutori out. |
| Date | 17:44:25, May 26, 2007 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | We are also disappointed with both Le Chaim and the GKF. |
| Date | 19:14:50, May 26, 2007 CET | From | Christian Democratic Alternative | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | € € € € € € €! I love Finance! |
| Date | 19:26:54, May 26, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Union Party | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | RiR- Do you really think the GKF, CDA and Le Chaim would accept this if it was detrimental to Hutori? How come we get a long speech on how rubbish our party is when Le Chaim, CDA an GKF get a one line response? |
| Date | 00:41:26, May 27, 2007 CET | From | Sensible Parity | To | Debating the Unity Coalition for Hutori |
| Message | Pro-union forces in our party have won out. We will support this cabinet. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 209 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 41 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: "Everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom." - Albert Einstein |