Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 01:02:32
Server time: 06:57:27, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The 80% Government Expenditure Reduction Act of 2411

Details

Submitted by[?]: Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2412

Description[?]:

The Moderate Libertarian Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Democratic Republic of Aloria.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:29:12, May 30, 2007 CET
FromParty Royale
ToDebating the The 80% Government Expenditure Reduction Act of 2411
MessageThis bill is absolutely ridiculous. What exactly is the rationale behind this? You want to stop funding our health care programs, destroy the environment and put unsafe food into the mouths of our citizens? Party Royale will not stand for any of this.

Date05:05:57, May 30, 2007 CET
FromIndustrialist Party of Aloria
ToDebating the The 80% Government Expenditure Reduction Act of 2411
MessageYou can't kill government spending in these areas. Reduce: Yes, but delete, I think not!

Date12:21:56, May 30, 2007 CET
FromSocial Reform Party
ToDebating the The 80% Government Expenditure Reduction Act of 2411
MessageThis is insane.

Date14:29:46, May 30, 2007 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the The 80% Government Expenditure Reduction Act of 2411
MessageYes, you're basically abolishing these ministries. Crazy.

Date15:32:51, May 30, 2007 CET
From Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
ToDebating the The 80% Government Expenditure Reduction Act of 2411
MessageWhy is it crazy, fellow capitalists (or in the FCP's case CINO=capitalist in name only)? What real business does government have in the areas we've eliminated? Do you want government telling your doctor what to do. Or who you can trade with across the globe? Besides some of these positions are just symbolic political appointments and nothing more. I thought you guys wanted less government and bloat? Why should the head of government need money? And all the necessary operations like defense and justice have been streamlined for fiscal efficency but by no means eliminated. The justice budget was even increased to make the system fairer! THE ERA OF BIG GOVERNMENT IN ALORIA IS OVER. It's time to stand behind your principals and stop voting for spending increases (as you did with the 26B to 29B hike) and for rampant deficit spending.

Date18:29:10, May 30, 2007 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the The 80% Government Expenditure Reduction Act of 2411
MessageYou don't seem to think that elsewhere.

Date19:24:10, May 30, 2007 CET
FromIndustrialist Party of Aloria
ToDebating the The 80% Government Expenditure Reduction Act of 2411
Message1) Do you want government telling your doctor what to do.
-Yes we do. We do not want unethical practices in the health care profession.

2) Or who you can trade with across the globe?
-No, for obvious reasons.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 177

no
     

Total Seats: 423

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy".

    Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 66