We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Organ Donation Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal and Centre Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2414
Description[?]:
: |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning organ donations.
Old value:: Organ donation is universal and compulsory.
Current: Unless otherwise stated, consent is assumed.
Proposed: Organ donations are legal with personal consent.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:22:37, June 10, 2007 CET | From | Dorvish Popular Front | To | Debating the Organ Donation Reform Act |
Message | We feel that 'ownership' of organs after the person has died is perhaps one of the ultimate examples of bourgeois individualism and is a disgraceful symbol of how selfish and corrupt our society is. Instead of contributing organs to benefit society and save lives, people are instead motivated by a foolish believe in 'individual liberties'. Civil rights do not extend to ownership of something after you have died which could be used to help people. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 297 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 102 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "The difference between a republic and a people's republic is a lot like the difference between a jacket and a straightjacket." - Ronald Reagan |