We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Union Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2415
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=658"> Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. This treaty will help strenthen our relations with Hulstria and and all the other nations in this treaty, furthermore, how can you have a bad free trade agreement? Everybody wins. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:32:25, June 15, 2007 CET | From | God's and the King's Fighters | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | Support. |
| Date | 18:57:22, June 15, 2007 CET | From | "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | Why not... |
| Date | 20:25:50, June 16, 2007 CET | From |  Wiedervereinigten Nationalisten | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | We have finally ratified this ourselves |
| Date | 10:57:25, June 17, 2007 CET | From | Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | You do realize they are fascists... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 204 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 46 |
| Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
| Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia |