We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Change Our Army
Details
Submitted by[?]: League of Communists
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2415
Description[?]:
| We need to reform our Army |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Keymon Defence Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:22:12, June 15, 2007 CET | From | Christian Fascist Party | To | Debating the Change Our Army |
| Message | The Christian Party is totally agianst this. chimical, biological and nuclear weapons prevent war and we will not give them up. We further believe that we should be allowed to export arms to allies, friendly nations and freedom fighters around the world who causes we support. The state should leave the defense industry to the private sector because the private sector can do just about everything better than the government. We do feel that a withdrawl from the Keymon Defence Agreement would be fine. |
| Date | 05:29:47, June 16, 2007 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Change Our Army |
| Message | We shall reserved our right to used chemical, biological and nuclear weapon aganist our enemy. Keymon Defence Agreement is a treaty that show our true feeling toward world peace. |
| Date | 11:35:22, June 16, 2007 CET | From | League of Communists | To | Debating the Change Our Army |
| Message | We retire some proposal: but we want to withdraw from Keymon Defence Agreement. We think Christian Party could support this new bill |
| Date | 16:56:13, June 16, 2007 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Change Our Army |
| Message | Keymon have been known as the neutral countries for a 100 years. We wish to reserve our right to defense their neutrality at all course. http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=224 |
| Date | 15:40:18, June 17, 2007 CET | From | Pontesi Anarcho-Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Change Our Army |
| Message | This nation should not get caught up in legally binding and restrictive treaties. All this will do is limit the scope of our defence capabilities. Whilst the Pontesi Anarcho-Capitalist Party does not believe in a state-funded militairy to begin with, and instead opts for the right of private enterprise to establish militairy if they so please, we certainly do not agree with the signing of any treaty such as this. In terms of defence, this nation must keep its options completely open. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 186 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 257 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 182 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction. |
| Random quote: "No man can outrun a bullet." - Idi Amin |