Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 00:06:27
Server time: 07:53:32, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): luthorian3059 | MyungJak | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Prevention of Tied Bills Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2038

Description[?]:

(I got tired of inventing names lol)

Just a simple bill to boost the number of representatives to prevent the chance of a 50-50 tie in the body, as unlikely as it may be.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Datenot recorded
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
MessageAny other odd number is fine, just yell them out here.

Datenot recorded
FromImperial Party
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
Message239 perhaps.

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
MessageWe propose at least doubling the current number of seats.

Datenot recorded
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
MessageAn odd number is not necessary I think because when the votes are equally divided, the bill is defeated. And an odd number wont prevent ties because when a party with an odd number of seats abstains from voting, a tie is possible.

Datenot recorded
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
MessageBut I agree with increasing the number of seats in Parliament.

Datenot recorded
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Par-tay
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
MessageYeah, this makes a bit of sense. I'll support this.

Datenot recorded
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Par-tay
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
MessageSDP, bear in mind though that the actual number of seats in parliament doesn't affect parliament very much, it's proportion, not number, which counts towards the sucess or failure of bills.

Datenot recorded
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
MessageI'd suggest seats be increased to 350.

Datenot recorded
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
MessageAnd perhaps we should shedule early elections as there are three new parties.

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
Message350 seems like a good number.

Datenot recorded
From
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
MessagePerhaps this should go to the vote soonish then?

Datenot recorded
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
Message351...

Datenot recorded
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
Message351 sounds good

Datenot recorded
FromImperial Party
ToDebating the Prevention of Tied Bills Act
MessageYes, The Imperial Party iis in agreement with the Social Democrat Party on this one.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 77

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640

      Random quote: "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." - Barry Goldwater

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 72