We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2415
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalists for Prosperity
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2415
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Free Movement of Gaduridos
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Imperial Commonwealth Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Imperial Commonwealth Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Imperial Commonwealth Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Free Movement of Gaduridos
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Capitalists for Prosperity
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Imperial Commonwealth Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Capitalists for Prosperity
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Gaduridos Dictatorship Radical Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Capitalists for Prosperity
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Imperial Commonwealth Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Capitalists for Prosperity
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Capitalists for Prosperity
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:14:05, June 17, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2415 |
| Message | We hope everyone is satisfied with their positions proposed in this cabinet. If not, we can always make amendments. As to the reason why the GDRP has only one seat. It is because they were given defense, an important ministry, and given their size, it seemed like that ministry was enough. |
| Date | 17:16:46, June 17, 2007 CET | From | Gaduri Resistencia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2415 |
| Message | Once again, the Hardline Communist Party feels that this arrangement is "not sexy enough to govern this country effectively". |
| Date | 17:35:29, June 17, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2415 |
| Message | Commies have no taste. |
| Date | 18:16:56, June 17, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Commonwealth Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2415 |
| Message | I like it. But i would like to say i tried to share it equally between the allies. |
| Date | 18:25:16, June 17, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2415 |
| Message | Having a cabinet with seats distributed proportionally to their contribution to the coalition seemed more appropriate to me. |
| Date | 18:38:25, June 17, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Commonwealth Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2415 |
| Message | i disagree to some extent because the smaller parties make the difference in this game, i know because 30 seats can be the difference for a act to passed. |
| Date | 19:17:14, June 17, 2007 CET | From | Gaduri Resistencia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2415 |
| Message | In fact it is at the moment.... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 204 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 201 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 30 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks |