We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 2415
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Democratic Socialists of Kazulia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2416
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the New Liberal Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the The Democratic Socialists of Kazulia
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Republican Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the New Liberal Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Republican Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the The Democratic Socialists of Kazulia
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the The Revolutionary Socialists of Kazulia
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:03:54, June 19, 2007 CET | From | The Democratic Socialists of Kazulia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2415 |
Message | I will leave this up for a day or two. |
Date | 00:40:40, June 19, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2415 |
Message | Still gotta say no, because we are rather near war at the moment. |
Date | 02:14:22, June 19, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2415 |
Message | maybe in a few months I can vote for this. |
Date | 02:20:35, June 19, 2007 CET | From | The Democratic Socialists of Kazulia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2415 |
Message | What would have to change. In a true coalition government what parties would have control of what offices? |
Date | 03:43:26, June 19, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2415 |
Message | It is difficult to have a unified government when the cabinet is rather polarized. |
Date | 07:09:58, June 19, 2007 CET | From | The Democratic Socialists of Kazulia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2415 |
Message | Not really. This way everyone feels like they have some authority even if only one party has all of the legislative powers. |
Date | 17:24:12, June 19, 2007 CET | From | Gao-Showato Kasu-Soto | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2415 |
Message | I think for the time being it is best to leave the Conservative Party in sole control of the government. None of the rest of the political parties in this nation have been before the electorate and none but the Conservatives have a mandate to govern. We may not all agree with the direction the Conservatives have taken this nation but let us use this time to build up support and after the next election we can decide a new government. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 100 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln |