We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Acte pour l'Expression Libre, [Partie 2] 2416
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union Démocrate Libertarien
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2416
Description[?]:
| Another aspect of this Free Expression which the UDL wishes to support is the deregulation of media content to provide for free viewing by all citizens. While objections may exist on moral grounds, it is important to note that Freudian psychoanalysis and psychology in general does indicate that repression is not healthy for the mind itself. If there are any objections to the airing of certain programs at certain times, one can choose not to watch or listen to those programs. In our opinion, the issue before us, colleagues, is quite straight-forward. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The time at which sexually explicit content may be shown on broadcast television (if allowed).
Old value:: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Current: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Proposed: Sexually explicit content may be shown all day long.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:31:15, June 19, 2007 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the Acte pour l'Expression Libre, [Partie 2] 2416 |
| Message | "After reorganizing, EASL finds itself in agreement with the UDL. We will support this particular policy on deregulation, although we consider it an act of liberalization. EASL does not usually support deregulation." -Zoé Bertrand Education and Culture Policy Chair, EASL |
| Date | 19:50:54, June 19, 2007 CET | From |  Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Acte pour l'Expression Libre, [Partie 2] 2416 |
| Message | There are limits the this new way of progressivism - indicating that this proposal is psychologically advantaged is not tollerated by our party's views on modern morality. |
| Date | 19:23:55, June 20, 2007 CET | From | Alliance Démocratique Ecologiste Rildani | To | Debating the Acte pour l'Expression Libre, [Partie 2] 2416 |
| Message | We consider that expression freedom is one thing and protection of childrens another. We moreover consider that this legislation would give a really poor image of our country in foreign countries. We therefore will vote against this bill, We also regret that a single party could flow the votes and have a majority by itself, this leads to anything but democracy Charlotte Magne Education and Culture Policy Chair, ADER |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 109 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 60 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "The streets are safe in Philadelphia, it's only the people who make them unsafe." - Frank Rizzo |