We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Re-Nationalisation of the Railways Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Labour Party of Cobura
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2418
Description[?]:
| We must bring services back up to standard. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Train Operating Companies (TOC).
Old value:: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Current: Private companies operate regional TOC's. The national service is provided by a publicly owned, national TOC.
Proposed: There is a single publicly owned TOC.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:39:57, June 22, 2007 CET | From |  Forward Cobura | To | Debating the Re-Nationalisation of the Railways Act |
| Message | Yeah, railways are pretty much a natural monopoly. No point creating inefficiencies. |
| Date | 17:47:33, June 22, 2007 CET | From | Party for Individualism and Kitties | To | Debating the Re-Nationalisation of the Railways Act |
| Message | no |
| Date | 17:50:50, June 22, 2007 CET | From | Federalist Party | To | Debating the Re-Nationalisation of the Railways Act |
| Message | Nope |
| Date | 17:46:13, June 23, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Labour Party of Cobura | To | Debating the Re-Nationalisation of the Railways Act |
| Message | Thanks to the liberal party, I need to sort out my political positions, |
| Date | 00:02:15, June 24, 2007 CET | From | Party for Individualism and Kitties | To | Debating the Re-Nationalisation of the Railways Act |
| Message | what have they/we done? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 120 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 339 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 41 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
| Random quote: "Democrats couldn't care less if people in Indiana hate them. But if Europeans curl their lips, liberals can't look at themselves in the mirror." - Ann Coulter |