Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 01:20:12
Server time: 06:39:47, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Identity and Preparedness Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free Lodamun

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2423

Description[?]:

This term would be limited to only 6 months immediately after high school or college and people would have the option of any branch of government service. This term is staggered over the year, so as to keep the military at a consistant population level. The only reason the military pays more is hazard pay. This would bolster a sense of national identity, provide on the job experience for young adults coming out of high school or a higher education institution and better prepare our military in the event of an attack. We can muster forces far more quickly with basic being completed early, then a few week refresher in the event of a draft. This is a sensible notion for this nation if one considers the Deltarian Occupation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:31:07, June 24, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageURP believes the benefits - slightly better defence - are outweighed by the huge cost of such a program and the reduction in Lodamun's freedom.

Date17:18:51, June 24, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageWe support.

Date02:23:26, June 25, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageWe support, but would like the term to be 1-2 years.

Date07:41:51, June 25, 2007 CET
FromCommunist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
Message'We support, but would like the term to be 1-2 years.'

1-2 years are too long. We support 6 months.

Date08:44:32, June 25, 2007 CET
FromFree Lodamun
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
Messagewhat's everyone's stance on 6 months?

Date18:29:20, June 25, 2007 CET
FromNew Democratic Party
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageSince the option is given for "civilian national service," we could support 6 months to 1 year.

Date18:29:54, June 25, 2007 CET
FromNew Democratic Party
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageSince the option is given for "civilian national service," we could support 6 months to 1 year.

Date18:34:04, June 25, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageWe will agree what ever the term as its better than the current, but we have expressed our prefrence term.

Date00:32:28, June 27, 2007 CET
FromFree Lodamun
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageChanged to 6 months.

Date00:34:33, June 27, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageThere are no benefits here, it doesn't improve our armed forces, it provides no benefit to the concript, and it is a waste of money.

Date05:50:35, June 27, 2007 CET
FromThe Unified Lodamun Party
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageI'm not really a fan of this anyhow, but six months is a bad idea unless you are going to break that six months up in the calendar year, meaning that you would have half of the graduates do their service immediately upon graduation, and the other half in the second half of the calendor school year. Otherwise our armed forces will be drastically cut come december every year, and any country that wanted to attack us would only have to do so during Christmas to avoid a way with the majority of our armed forces.

Date12:34:50, June 27, 2007 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageGenerally the draft wouldn't occur at one specific moment each year. When recruits hit a certain age, then they would be drafted.

Date23:29:02, June 28, 2007 CET
FromNew Democratic Party
ToDebating the National Identity and Preparedness Act
MessageCan we put this to a vote?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 275

no
    

Total Seats: 324

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted.

    Random quote: "And what is Aleppo?" - Gary Johnson

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 84