We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Computer Crime Bill 2090
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriarchal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2093
Description[?]:
It is ridiculous that the police are not permitted to conduct investigations on crimes committed via the internet or through its use. A new police unit should be formed to deal specifically with this issue. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Internet regulations.
Old value:: The government has no position on who may use or what is published on the internet.
Current: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Proposed: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:42:30, August 05, 2005 CET | From | Circuit Party | To | Debating the Computer Crime Bill 2090 |
Message | We strongly oppose this proposition.We are against child abuse but it should not be mixed with other issues. |
Date | 12:12:51, August 05, 2005 CET | From | Patriarchal Party | To | Debating the Computer Crime Bill 2090 |
Message | Child abuse is not the subject of this bill. The proposal simply outlines some possible uses of these new police powers; child abuse is only one such use. |
Date | 14:51:30, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Makonian Stalinist Coalition | To | Debating the Computer Crime Bill 2090 |
Message | We agree, the State should have the powers to track dangerous people on the Internet. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 297 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 81 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 122 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "In public policy, it matters less who has the best arguments and more who gets heard, and by whom." - Ralph Reed |