We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Clean Fuel Bill - a sensible approach
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rutania Shaor
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2419
Description[?]:
| Even though we feel changes need to be made, they shouldn't be as aggressive towards the drivers. Maybe in the future but our nation needs time to adapt. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Current: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Proposed: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:14:04, June 25, 2007 CET | From |  Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the Clean Fuel Bill - a sensible approach |
| Message | We will decide how the original proposals progress before coming to a position regarding this bill. At present our favoured option is to take the single most progressive move with regards to automobile pollution that it is possible to take, ban polluting vehicles. |
| Date | 14:08:39, June 26, 2007 CET | From | Rutania Shaor | To | Debating the Clean Fuel Bill - a sensible approach |
| Message | Why exactly do the Federal Republican Party disagree with this? |
| Date | 02:44:46, June 27, 2007 CET | From | Federal Republican Party | To | Debating the Clean Fuel Bill - a sensible approach |
| Message | Because it's unfair to give people tax breaks for being environmentalist. |
| Date | 00:06:19, June 28, 2007 CET | From | Rutania Shaor | To | Debating the Clean Fuel Bill - a sensible approach |
| Message | So you are not an environmentalist in the slightest? That's very irresponsible for a leader in today's world. Yet another embarrassing decision from the majority party. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 339 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 411 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
| Random quote: "When we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, 'Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!'" - Martin Luther King Jr. |