Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5475
Next month in: 01:28:08
Server time: 22:31:51, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | Lab47AU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Treason Act 2420

Details

Submitted by[?]: Socialist Party of Greater Hulstria

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2420

Description[?]:

WHEREAS treason against the Imperial Crownlands of Greater Hulstria, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:00:23, June 27, 2007 CET
From Kaiserliche Hulsterreichische Partei
ToDebating the Treason Act 2420
MessageYea... no

Date19:06:33, June 27, 2007 CET
From Socialist Party of Greater Hulstria
ToDebating the Treason Act 2420
MessageFrom this day forward, the accusation of treason will no longer be used in Hulstria to rid the nation of political opponents.

Date19:14:06, June 27, 2007 CET
From Kaiserliche Hulsterreichische Partei
ToDebating the Treason Act 2420
MessageTwo witnesses? What about solid evidence.

Date19:30:42, June 27, 2007 CET
From Gao-Showa Imperial Party
ToDebating the Treason Act 2420
Messageleave it to judges and juries to decide

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 76

no
    

Total Seats: 275

abstain
  

Total Seats: 294


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 50