We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Secure Borders Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2421
Description[?]:
This law reforms the borders and our foreign policy as seen below. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning immigration.
Old value:: Everyone is allowed to reside permanently in this nation.
Current: Everyone is allowed to reside permanently in this nation.
Proposed: Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The national refugee policy.
Old value:: All refugees are welcome but no financial aid is given to them.
Current: All refugees are welcome, regardless of their reason, and given aid in integrating them into the country.
Proposed: All refugees are welcome, regardless of their reason, and given aid in integrating them into the country.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Current: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Proposed: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:41:51, June 28, 2007 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the Secure Borders Act |
Message | It isnt the governments to control the labour market, it controls itselfs, lets not waste peoples time. What have you got against refugees? We should welcome those persecuted by their own governments. In any case we shouldn't be giving them money, since it involves taking money of our citizens to give to them, which will breed resentment and harm integration. Theres no real need for such intensive border controls. If we know there identities we can turn away those convicted criminals who may harm our nation. |
Date | 21:57:46, June 28, 2007 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Secure Borders Act |
Message | If you have an unregistered flow of immigrants based upon no qualifications then unemployment will skyrocket, and the market cannot completely control itself the government has to help and regulate in areas, that is ridiculous. I'm sorry I made a mistake earlier on that propsal, this is the proposal that I wanted to include. Most of the time they are not convicted criminals, and most of the time its not convicted criminals, sometimes its unconvicted criminals, dangerously unstable persons, and then you have the drug dealers, and criminals that have escaped to our country and require our police forces to spend our tax money on trying to capture and extradite him, you need to think a little outside the box sir. |
Date | 01:37:50, June 29, 2007 CET | From | HaLeumit Tikvah | To | Debating the Secure Borders Act |
Message | The market can control itself. If unemployment starts to rise, then the number of immigrants entering the country decreases, because there is more competition for jobs. My point still stands- integration aid creates resentment which harms integration. If they are unconvicted, more stringent security will very rarely work, since there is nothing on their records indicating that they are criminals. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 32 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 123 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information. |
Random quote: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Bill Clinton |