We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Imperial Party of Selucian
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2092
Description[?]:
| This bill contains a compromise of a strong majority in our empire |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The title of the head of government, who chairs the cabinet.
Old value:: Prime Minister
Current: Cōnsul
Proposed: Imperial Consul
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The official title of the legislative assembly.
Old value:: Parliament
Current: Senātus Populī
Proposed: Imperial Senate
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The official title of subnational entities, also known as regions.
Old value:: Region
Current: Prōvincia
Proposed: Imperial Province
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 100
Current: 200
Proposed: 385
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:34:27, August 05, 2005 CET | From | New Passive Militarist Party | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | We support articlea 1-3, but we would appreciate an explanation of the need for an increase of seats. |
| Date | 22:37:02, August 05, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Party of Selucian | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | We Think no debating is needed in this special case. As 2/3 majority of us will support this bill we take the chance. |
| Date | 22:40:14, August 05, 2005 CET | From | New Passive Militarist Party | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | A little excited, are we? |
| Date | 22:41:52, August 05, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Party of Selucian | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | We are, ...but I dislike roleplaying ppl who just appear close before they are setted "inactive' and all 6 days before they were loast in space. |
| Date | 23:01:27, August 05, 2005 CET | From | New Passive Militarist Party | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | Real spoilers, aren't they. |
| Date | 23:11:40, August 05, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Party of Selucian | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | yeah, indeed. |
| Date | 15:26:02, August 06, 2005 CET | From | New Passive Militarist Party | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | So what is the reason for the increase in seats? |
| Date | 15:40:11, August 06, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Party of Selucian | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | We think our nation with more than 52 million citizens need more seats to represent them better. This would also avoid situations we had before, we think. |
| Date | 01:05:39, August 07, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Selucian Libertarian Party | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | We support all the measures named in the bill. |
| Date | 14:27:43, August 07, 2005 CET | From | New Passive Militarist Party | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | The PMP is convinced and will support this bill as it is. |
| Date | 21:53:30, August 07, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Selucian Libertarian Party | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | This bill should give our nation some character and seperate it from other countries. |
| Date | 06:01:29, August 08, 2005 CET | From | National Front | To | Debating the IPS - The Imperial Compromise Act |
| Message | This is a wonderful bill and has the full support of the National Front. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 72 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 28 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Hatred is gained as much by good works as by evil." - Niccolo Machiavelli |