We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Declaration of Support for the Endralonian Government
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Arab Party of Kafuristan
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2421
Description[?]:
The Endralonian Government is being pressured by foreign anti-sovereignty elements to restricts it's own path. The Endralonians should be freely allowed to choose to go any direction they choose, and Kafuristan fully respects and supports their right to engage in any action to protect their own sovereignty within reasonable bounds. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:22:05, June 30, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Declaration of Support for the Endralonian Government |
Message | What exactly is going on in Endralon and who is pressuring them? Why should Kafuristan become involved? |
Date | 00:44:14, July 01, 2007 CET | From | National Arab Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Declaration of Support for the Endralonian Government |
Message | Tukrali, see: http://www.takeforum.com/particracy/viewtopic.php?p=154213#154213 |
Date | 02:03:06, July 02, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Declaration of Support for the Endralonian Government |
Message | The message says Tukarali is not a part of the military alliance being formed. It doesn't mention what nations are a part of the alliance. We should have waited until we had a better understanding of the situation before making any declarations of support for Endralon. |
Date | 03:50:10, July 02, 2007 CET | From | National Arab Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Declaration of Support for the Endralonian Government |
Message | Did we ever say the statement of support is for Endralon against Tukrali? |
Date | 04:23:48, July 02, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Declaration of Support for the Endralonian Government |
Message | I asked who was pressuring Endralon, you answered with Tukarali. So, I thought you were saying that Tukarali was the one behind the military alliance that is being formed. That thread doesn't mention who is considering military action, just that someone is. We shouldn't make any declarations of support without knowing who we are supporting Endralon against. Also, I still don't see why Kafuristan should become involved in the situation. In the thread, you said "Kafuristan fully supports and respects the sovereign will of Endralon and is willing to support any reasonable action it takes to secure it's soveriegnty". Would this support include military support of Endralon? |
Date | 04:53:48, July 02, 2007 CET | From | National Arab Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Declaration of Support for the Endralonian Government |
Message | If that is the only option. But we hope diplomatic solutions would work, and if Endralon is to not attempt to settle matters using diplomacy first, and that all options have been used, then yes. But military support is something we hope won't occur, but we will if necessary. We cannot allow other nations to impose their rule on other nations. |
Date | 04:59:21, July 02, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Declaration of Support for the Endralonian Government |
Message | OOC: The Rildanor Accords are the accepted rules for declaring war correct. |
Date | 18:52:03, July 02, 2007 CET | From | National Arab Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Declaration of Support for the Endralonian Government |
Message | Yes. Ish. The Accords are for calculating army size and that's it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 132 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 129 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 239 |
Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way. |
Random quote: "The most certain test by which we judge whether a country is really free is the amount of security enjoyed by minorities." - John Dalberg-Acton |