Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5504
Next month in: 00:06:29
Server time: 11:53:30, June 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Alv | HopesFor | Nileowen_Bal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: charter school regulation

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Unified Lodamun Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2423

Description[?]:

Charter schools will not be allowed to make a profit.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:25:25, June 30, 2007 CET
FromThe Unified Lodamun Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageWe need to protect some of the members of our Kingdoms from the indecency that is greed. Education must be protected and treated as sacred.

Date13:38:51, June 30, 2007 CET
FromRadical Nationalist Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageWe can agree to this.

Date14:00:26, June 30, 2007 CET
FromNew Democratic Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageHear, hear. We are proud to support the Unified Lodamun Party. The NDP believes that children are our future, that we should teach them well and let them lead the way. No one should profit from their education.

Date22:30:36, June 30, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageIf people choose to send their children to schools that make a profit, isn't that their choice? One would assume that non-profit and for profit charter schools exist side by side under the current law. If a non-profit is cheaper, people would probably send their children there. But if a for profit school offered a better education at a good price, shouldn't parents have the right to send their children to those schools? Why do we need to take options off the table for parents other than to satisfy an anti-capitalist agenda?

Date22:47:02, June 30, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Distributionist Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageNeed there be another reason?

Date00:20:45, July 01, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
Messagewhat is the LDP referring to?

Date03:21:52, July 01, 2007 CET
FromThe Unified Lodamun Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageIt is not an anticapitolist agenda. Its an agenda that forces schools to use the money they bring in with tuition on the students, and facilities, and not on new cars for themselves.

Date05:05:53, July 01, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageIt's not a bad thing to make money, that's capitalism. Anti-capitalist ULP logic dictates no profit and less choice for the parents of Lodamun. Other than an aversion to capitalism, why would any party support this travesty of a bill or many of the others which have rolled back the Lodamese free market in recent years. URP is the only party which consistentaly fights against the idiotic regulations the ULP among others want to impose.

Date23:24:34, July 01, 2007 CET
FromThe Unified Lodamun Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageWith that said, lets vote.

Date07:55:13, July 02, 2007 CET
FromThe Unified Lodamun Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageOOC What the Hell????? How are two of the absolute most heavily based small government parties against this. Its' just baffling. SOmetims you folks just don't make sense. Actually, URP, you rarely do.

Date08:32:07, July 02, 2007 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageSmall government means LESS regulation, this is just more regulation.

Date18:07:06, July 02, 2007 CET
FromLodamun Distributionist Party
ToDebating the charter school regulation
MessageNot true at all. Small government only means less regulation at a certain level. We could, in theory, have a number of local dictatorships with allied warlords, if we wanted.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 256

no
   

Total Seats: 322

abstain
 

Total Seats: 21


Random fact: There are two countries based on Egypt in the game. Cobura is based on modern Egypt with a retro twist, while Hawu Mumenhes is based on Ancient Egypt with a modernist twist.

Random quote: "A dictatorship is a country where they have taken the politics out of politics." - Sam Himmell

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73