We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom to Hunt and Fish Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Selucian Corporate Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2094
Description[?]:
A BILL Realizing that 30.99% of our citizens agree with this proposal, Realizing that hunting and fishing has been at the core of civilization to gather the resources to live, Let it be resolved that our citizens have the freedom to hunt and fish without regulation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Current: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Proposed: Hunting and fishing is not regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:21:14, August 06, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Party of Selucian | To | Debating the Freedom to Hunt and Fish Act |
Message | We don't think so and wont support this bill |
Date | 15:29:43, August 06, 2005 CET | From | New Passive Militarist Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Hunt and Fish Act |
Message | Unlimited hunting and fishing will deplete those things which we hunt and fish for. Wise management is preferable over a free-for-all. The PMP does not support this bill. |
Date | 01:02:09, August 07, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Selucian Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Hunt and Fish Act |
Message | We agree, minimal government intervention! |
Date | 02:46:15, August 07, 2005 CET | From | Selucian Corporate Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Hunt and Fish Act |
Message | We thank the ISLP for their support and believe this regulation is un-necessary and puts a hamper on recreation as well as our economy. |
Date | 04:17:02, August 08, 2005 CET | From | New Passive Militarist Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Hunt and Fish Act |
Message | Let us at least protect the endangered species. |
Date | 12:07:25, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Party of Selucian | To | Debating the Freedom to Hunt and Fish Act |
Message | "...Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods..." This law makes sure also the next generations will be able to do this. We can't waste our living resources just because someone had a crazy idea after he abused drugs. |
Date | 05:22:15, August 11, 2005 CET | From | New Passive Militarist Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Hunt and Fish Act |
Message | The current law makes sense to uss too. If your favourite animal to hunt is out of season, go deep-sea fishing. The supply of animals upon these isles is limited and a rational policy limiting how many of them can be hunted ensures that they will survive into the next generation, so that future hunters may also enjoy the same thrill. In fact, we would not be adverse to limiting the means used in hunting to the following weapons: 1. Bow 2. Spear 3. Bare Hands 4. Sling and Stone 5. Overgrown Fingernails |
Date | 02:21:15, August 12, 2005 CET | From | New Passive Militarist Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Hunt and Fish Act |
Message | This bill has been in debate for about three years now. There has been no new debate (except for some homegrown PMP sarcasm) for some time now. Could this *PLEASE* either be put to a vote or deleted from the agenda? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 26 | |||
no | Total Seats: 33 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 22 |
Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: "Nature provides a free lunch, but only if we control our appetites." - William Ruckelshaus |