We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom to Procreate Act of 2422
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian Democratic Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2422
Description[?]:
The CDU moves to amend this positively Orwellian statute and banish this afrontment unto the Lord from the lawbooks forever. The government is not some infallible arbiter of competency in anything, let alone parenting. This is an intrusion into the private sphere of the most perverse and pervasive sort and should remedied as soon as humanly possible. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning parental qualifications.
Old value:: The government requires a test for would-be parents, if parents circumvent the test they are allowed to keep the children, but are watched for incompentence.
Current: The government does not hold qualifications for new parents.
Proposed: The government does not hold qualifications for new parents.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:13:04, July 02, 2007 CET | From | People's Mujaheddin | To | Debating the Freedom to Procreate Act of 2422 |
Message | This is a precaution set in place to prevent unfit parents to adopt and parent children. This law actually saves a lot of kids from undergoing a terrible childhood which could include childmolesting, sexual harassment and beatings. We do not understand how you could call this an intrusion. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 32 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 37 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 11 |
Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position. |
Random quote: "Global warmers predict that global warming is coming, and our emissions are to blame. They do that to keep us worried about our role in the whole thing. If we aren't worried and guilty, we might not pay their salaries. It's that simple." - Kary Mullis |