We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: to many NMP and URP bills Act.
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Unified Lodamun Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2423
Description[?]:
| Our legislature is getting bogged down with legislation which is causing us to do a poor job in debating and weighing the pros and cons of various laws. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 10
Current: 20
Proposed: 6
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 15
Current: 20
Proposed: 10
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:19:56, July 02, 2007 CET | From | The Unified Lodamun Party | To | Debating the to many NMP and URP bills Act. |
| Message | Are we ready to do this yet. I mean seriously, 10 bills in the month of September is just far to many. I truly don't have roughly ten minutes per bill to read and react to. Which at this point would be something like 3 hours just for debate, let alone anything else with the rest of our country like news clippings and whatnot. |
| Date | 22:21:40, July 02, 2007 CET | From | Democrats | To | Debating the to many NMP and URP bills Act. |
| Message | We shall back this, although we wish to make it clear that our bills shall be up for the next year at least. |
| Date | 22:21:44, July 02, 2007 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the to many NMP and URP bills Act. |
| Message | first it's right after elections and second, i spelled out the conditions under which i suport a reduction, third if you want to push this bill at least change the number to 6 (1 every 2 months) |
| Date | 22:26:05, July 02, 2007 CET | From | Democrats | To | Debating the to many NMP and URP bills Act. |
| Message | Actually a better system would be to limit the number of Bills that can be stored, so as to ensure that Bills can't be rushed all at once, but active parties can still propose Bills regularly. |
| Date | 01:08:10, July 03, 2007 CET | From | Free Lodamun | To | Debating the to many NMP and URP bills Act. |
| Message | As long as this is in the discussion phase, please add a proposal so only 10 bills are stored. |
| Date | 01:12:07, July 03, 2007 CET | From | The Unified Lodamun Party | To | Debating the to many NMP and URP bills Act. |
| Message | How can you do that? Is that under the quota that any party can have, which is 15 presently? |
| Date | 01:16:37, July 03, 2007 CET | From | Free Lodamun | To | Debating the to many NMP and URP bills Act. |
| Message | It is the next one in line. go back to where you found this originally. Or, scroll down until you see a 15. |
| Date | 01:40:59, July 03, 2007 CET | From | Radical Nationalist Party | To | Debating the to many NMP and URP bills Act. |
| Message | Maybe 6 would be best, also changing the number we can accumilate would be better aswell so we dont have people just saving them all to just flood us with bills. |
| Date | 04:49:19, July 04, 2007 CET | From | Independent Republican Party | To | Debating the to many NMP and URP bills Act. |
| Message | Agreed. We don't have time to adequately debate bills if we're voting on 10-15 per day. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 231 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 279 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 89 |
| Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "Seventy-seven percent of anti-abortion leaders are men. 100% of them will never be pregnant." - Planned Parenthood advertisement |