We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Lodamun
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2424
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:32:19, July 03, 2007 CET | From | Free Lodamun | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | NP, please take down your discussion on this topic. It will be put to a vote tomorrow. |
| Date | 06:04:37, July 04, 2007 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | While the URP applauds free trade, we simply cannot support free trade with this vile monarchist regime. |
| Date | 07:18:06, July 04, 2007 CET | From | The Unified Lodamun Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | Were we invited to join this treaty by Hulstria?? And if so why isn't our foreign relations cabinet member brining this up?? |
| Date | 07:42:56, July 04, 2007 CET | From | Free Lodamun | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | um. they did. they're me. thanks for playing. |
| Date | 13:20:06, July 04, 2007 CET | From | Democrats | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | Aye we can back, not only is Hulstria actually a member of this (unlike with Keymon), two of our neighbours are also members. |
| Date | 03:30:42, July 05, 2007 CET | From | Free Lodamun | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | Well this isn't going anywhere it seems. Apparently we have three parties that don't want to see us get along with our neighbors. |
| Date | 03:32:51, July 05, 2007 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | Says the party advocating invasion of migadon. |
| Date | 05:26:08, July 05, 2007 CET | From | Free Lodamun | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | your lack of cognitive reading skills is becoming tiresome. |
| Date | 12:52:44, July 05, 2007 CET | From | Democrats | To | Debating the Ratification of the Greater Hulstria Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | ooc: Aye URP, so far I believe that the FL has only raised that issue ooc, seems unfair to attack them about it IC. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 192 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 362 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 45 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "They should rule who are able to rule best." - Aristotle |