Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:58:29
Server time: 19:01:30, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ImperialLodamun | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Privacy Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Luthori Christian Women's Association

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2425

Description[?]:

All citizens are entitled to a degree of privacy from busy-bodying law enforcement agencies. People should not be spied upon unless there is a good reason.


Belinda Braithwaite
(Viceroy & Leader of the LCWA)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:05:20, July 05, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageMr Speaker,

Before I can instruct my whips on how to make the party vote I need something clearing up. What difference does this proposal make? It reads to me as a different way of saying the same thing.

I yield the floor.

Date22:07:00, July 05, 2007 CET
FromImperial Vodka and Pimm's Party
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageMr Speaker,

We suggest a more complete right to privacy.

Date22:48:35, July 05, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

In response to the BCD, in this proposal, there is a check by the law upon the government to stop an abuse of power.

In response to the LPP, sometimes it is necessary to violate privacy for security and investigative matters.

The Secular Party supports this bill.

I yield the floor.

Date23:38:41, July 05, 2007 CET
FromImperial Vodka and Pimm's Party
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageMr Speaker,

Even so, we would prefer a complete right to privacy. If the police cannot find enough evidence to convict a person without monitoring that person twenty four hours a day then they have no right to arrest or prosecute.

Date20:36:50, July 06, 2007 CET
FromSecular Party
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

Well, then it's a good thing that the monitoring only occurs once the person is arrested in this proposal, isn't it?

I yield the floor.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 72

no
    

Total Seats: 28

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362

    Random quote: "The activist is not the man who says the river is dirty. The activist is the man who cleans up the river." - Ross Perot

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 56