We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Lets not be silly
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarcho-Communist Action Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2424
Description[?]:
| I'd rather not have this shit lying around the place |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:09:33, July 06, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Lets not be silly |
| Message | This is insane. Those weapons are vital deterrants for the sake of the safety of the nation. While we don't mind banning chemical and biological weapons, the nuclear weapons must be kept in our possession. By the way, do try to have the environment a little more sanctified, alright? Let's not swear. |
| Date | 02:04:45, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Anarcho-Communist Action Front | To | Debating the Lets not be silly |
| Message | OOOOOOOOOOH! |
| Date | 02:04:55, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Anarcho-Communist Action Front | To | Debating the Lets not be silly |
| Message | PRICK |
| Date | 18:17:40, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Lets not be silly |
| Message | Nice way to show what little brainpower you have. |
| Date | 19:52:32, July 08, 2007 CET | From | Gaduri Resistencia | To | Debating the Lets not be silly |
| Message | Nice way to show what a hypocrite you are... |
| Date | 02:09:19, July 09, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Lets not be silly |
| Message | By how, exactly? It wasn't me who called anyone a prick. |
| Date | 11:00:50, July 09, 2007 CET | From | Gaduri Resistencia | To | Debating the Lets not be silly |
| Message | You responded to his ad hominem attack with one of your own. |
| Date | 19:55:59, July 09, 2007 CET | From | Capitalists for Prosperity | To | Debating the Lets not be silly |
| Message | So sue me. |
| Date | 22:53:17, July 09, 2007 CET | From | Gaduri Resistencia | To | Debating the Lets not be silly |
| Message | Just proves that you need to get of your high horse, that's all. Might be a lesson worth learning... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 206 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 229 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "We had no domestic attacks under Bush." - Rudy Giuliani |