We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Safer World for Our Children Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kirlawa Green Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2052
Description[?]:
Ban nuclear weapons. What if they would fall in the wrong hands... Vote this proposal and make the world a safer place. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | not recorded |
From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Safer World for Our Children Act | Message | The problem with this is if our neighboring countries have them and we don't. And even if they "dis-arm" we still cannot be sure that they are being honest. There for as the American saying goes "better to be safe than sorry". |
Date | not recorded |
From | Kirlawa Green Party | To | Debating the Safer World for Our Children Act | Message | What is we do not have any, and our neighbours have. Well do you think they'd use them? If they really would like to invade us I don't think they would use something that would destroy our land completely. Also about the terroristhreat. Having our own nukes doesn't make a difference to terrorists. They are (usually) not connected to any nation, so we couldn't retaliate with our own nukes. |
Date | not recorded |
From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Safer World for Our Children Act | Message | Good point. Although I do not know about you, but I'm not always the best at discerning or judging people on what exactly their “true” intentions are concerning any one issue. So it's very difficult me to say without any doubt that no other nation would attack Kirlawa using nuclear weapons. Power in any given country can change, thus a Stalinist or Expansionist could gain power and could easily attack JUST the Kirlawan Government and seize control over the entire territory. I believe in order for one to be a strong leader, one must not trust only what he believes is possible but also what is possible in a purely hypothetical sense. |
Date | not recorded |
From | Conservative Christian Royalists | To | Debating the Safer World for Our Children Act | Message | no way. it is always safe to have a back up. threat of nuclear war will stop all wars in future through fear of nuclear war. we cannot alow our nation to be seen as weak and pathetic. if we are invaded you are right we may not find ourselves victims of nuclear attack, however the threat of war is unlikely with an ace up our sleeve. |
Date | not recorded |
From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Safer World for Our Children Act | Message | Example: Country A: 'Lets Ban all Nukes' Country B: 'Okay great.' Country C: 'We agree only if all countries ban them’ *everyone signs in agreement* "Country C, then breaks the agreement and attacks countries A and B with nuclear weapons* |
Date | not recorded |
From | Imperial Party | To | Debating the Safer World for Our Children Act | Message | I think the Conservative Christian Alliance sums it up quite nicely. Only really to be used as a deterrent, to safeguard each nation in the event of a conflict, and from those who would use them (as even if one eliminates nuclear weapons, the technology and knowlegde of them will prevail, and production could potentially be reanimated). Thus holding the position for Head of State — and considering that a bill of this type has been earlier defeated in Rutania — The Imperial Party, as representative of Rutania, object to this proposal. |
Date | not recorded |
From | Kirlawa Green Party | To | Debating the Safer World for Our Children Act | Message | SPQK, I have proposed the creation of a nuclear shield for all nuclear-disarmed nations. This would portect us from conventional nuclear strikes. Would you be willing to support this? |
Date | 22:48:37, May 02, 2005 CET |
From | | To | Debating the Safer World for Our Children Act | Message | The ARA is split on this issue. The Mullet-caucus (chaired by Alice Cooper) is strongly in support to "Kickin' some serious ass," but the Effeminate-man-caucus (Justin Timberlake, head) thinks that "love will conquer all. We will have to give this some serious thought. |
Date | 23:49:46, May 13, 2005 CET |
From | Conservative Christian Royalists | To | Debating the Safer World for Our Children Act | Message | this is madness this is like leaving a lion without its teeth. the CCR as the defense minister refuse to ever support this weakening act. dont be stupied. we are facing threst from dorvik. let us keep our saftey and prevent war with dorvik. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 63 |
no | Total Seats: 109 |
abstain | Total Seats: 18 |
Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
Random quote: "When we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, 'Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!'" - Martin Luther King Jr. |