We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Differing Social Values Bill of 2427
Details
Submitted by[?]: Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2427
Description[?]:
| Understanding that Crossdressing harms no one in any way and is just a means of self-expression, as well as there is no reasonable reason why it should stay illegal. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Crossdressing is prohibited by the state.
Current: Crossdressing is allowed.
Proposed: Crossdressing is allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:52:56, July 12, 2007 CET | From |  People's Mujaheddin | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | Crossdressing is the first step towards sexual abnormality. Legalizing it would mean that we open up doors to all kinds of sexual abnormalities. |
| Date | 00:54:04, July 12, 2007 CET | From | Radikalna Partija | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | no. and i wont argue with you again. |
| Date | 01:28:33, July 12, 2007 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | sorry the FP is conservative on these kind of matters. |
| Date | 02:35:50, July 12, 2007 CET | From | Radikalna Partija | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | see DN, your friend is a conservative too. and you wont argue with him? |
| Date | 15:33:40, July 12, 2007 CET | From | Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | I wasn't online, sir. And we aren't "friends" or "allies" we just think alike on certain issues, and differently on others. Such as this one. Crossdressing harms no one in any form. And the argument that it opens up doors to sexuality abnormality...so what? Whats sexually normal today was abnormal years ago, and whats normal in the future will be different from now. Sexuality is whatever people choose it to be, and is between a person and their partner. Bills and laws should be created and inforced to protect peoples civil liberties and freedoms, never to restrict them because other people don't like it. Thats just too bad. What you're doing here is giving in to intolerance and the idea that some people know better then others. This creates a rift in society, and is not something a SOCIAList nation to strive for. |
| Date | 16:51:00, July 12, 2007 CET | From | Radikalna Partija | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | he has you for a friend. and if socialism is crossdressing for you, then i prefere you in his block. |
| Date | 18:09:16, July 12, 2007 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | Sorry i wouldnt say we are allies as such. It is ok for parties to have different ideas but when they see a party or two being oppressive to the people then they will come together to give people freedom again. However with this Bill it doesnt stop people crossdressing in their homes.So i dont see the need for people to crossdress in public. |
| Date | 20:11:16, July 12, 2007 CET | From | Radikalna Partija | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | how is strong regulation and state ownership opressive? because it offers security to the members of society? |
| Date | 20:54:17, July 12, 2007 CET | From | Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | "how is strong regulation and state ownership opressive? because it offers security to the members of society?" Uh..it's not. Never said it was. So long as the people ARE the state it's the ideal form of government in our book. |
| Date | 22:59:09, July 12, 2007 CET | From | Radikalna Partija | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | that question was not directed at you. |
| Date | 01:34:17, July 13, 2007 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Differing Social Values Bill of 2427 |
| Message | State ownership is corrupt with all top jobs going to party elites and closed shop for non-socialists and opponents.Also State ownership has proven to be inefficient and cant handle competition from foriegn firms. Therefore they go bankrupt and the state pays huges amount of money to save the company. \r\n\r\n"it offers security to the members of society"\r\nSurely offering security is giving people a stable economy, which the FP have done previously.We will get people off state-handouts and into work. We believe in a "safety net". But this should be short term while they look for a job. Not something they can live on for the rest of their lives. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 48 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 21 |
| Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
| Random quote: "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |