We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: UIF Bill IV: Housing For The Poor
Details
Submitted by[?]: I need to make new party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2428
Description[?]:
| The lower income families in this country deserve proper housing for themselves and there families. The government should take the first steps to act by passing this bill. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government policy regarding housing.
Old value:: All housing is private but rent is subsidised for low-income households.
Current: The state provides public housing to low-income families.
Proposed: The state contracts with private companies to provide public housing.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:08:26, July 13, 2007 CET | From |  Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the UIF Bill IV: Housing For The Poor |
| Message | "The lower income families in this country deserve proper housing for themselves and there families. " They sure do. Do you have proof that they don't though? Why do you assume that the poor live in shacks? |
| Date | 03:49:37, July 13, 2007 CET | From | I need to make new party | To | Debating the UIF Bill IV: Housing For The Poor |
| Message | ???? Are you saying the poor live in Mansions? No really you have the worst arguments for everything. You know very well that if your a low income family you cant afford good housing. So your going to deny people proper housing because we cant assume they are "Poor Enough" basically All your party cares about it POLITICAL ALLYS that all you could care about. You could care less about people livving on the streets as long as it gave you a few mor months in power. Im glad our democracy is working.... Its also good to see the % of sarcastic assholes in this country have doubled in the last months |
| Date | 10:59:15, July 13, 2007 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the UIF Bill IV: Housing For The Poor |
| Message | I'm saying that you're assuming the poor aren't provided for and we therefore require a change of policy. What makes you make that assumption? Think before you make policy and/or poor attempts at argument. |
| Date | 18:33:10, July 13, 2007 CET | From | I need to make new party | To | Debating the UIF Bill IV: Housing For The Poor |
| Message | Im saying to help more at what it being done... If we still have people without proper housing and living in poverty then obviously the current policy s not enough |
| Date | 04:01:30, July 15, 2007 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the UIF Bill IV: Housing For The Poor |
| Message | Yes that would be obvious were the current policy failing. Clearly, no one else here thinks it is. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 200 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When elections in a country are held, all bills in the voting phase are reset to the debate phase. |
| Random quote: "In a sense we have come to our nation's capital to cash a cheque. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." - Martin Luther King Jr. |