Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 02:54:04
Server time: 01:05:55, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dnobb | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Tax Reduction Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Arab Party of Kafuristan

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2429

Description[?]:

Billions of Kafurimarks are being wasted each year, not put to better and more useful purposes. We should reduce restrictions on domestic purchases of domestic goods!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:39:01, July 14, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic Party
ToDebating the Tax Reduction Act
MessageIf you lower the corporation profit tax more and leave the luxury tax as it is, we can support.

Date01:48:56, July 14, 2007 CET
From National Arab Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Tax Reduction Act
MessageBut wouldn't decreasing the sales tax increase the profit, thereby increasing taxes earned?

Date01:52:47, July 14, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic Party
ToDebating the Tax Reduction Act
MessageNo, because the tax is imposed after the profit has been made; we do not take more tax later.

For example, if a company makes 100 KAFs profit, we presently take 60 KAFs. However, if we lowered the Profit Tax to say 45%, we would only take 45 KAFs.

In the first example this would leave 40 KAFs "real profit", and 55 in the second example. We do not tax this final amount.

Date02:14:25, July 14, 2007 CET
From National Arab Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Tax Reduction Act
MessageYes, but wouldn't some companies pass this tax to their consumers? Thereby reducing consumption and thus profit?

Date15:52:58, July 14, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic Party
ToDebating the Tax Reduction Act
MessageMaybe, but they do this already!

Date17:54:22, July 14, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic Party
ToDebating the Tax Reduction Act
MessageIf we want the economy to grow we need to allow them to keep more profit, by reducing sales tax. If you do that, and keep Luxury Tax at 18, we will support it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 291

no
   

Total Seats: 214

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility.

    Random quote: "When was the last time you talked about race with someone of a different race? If the answer is never, you're part of the problem." - Bill Bradley

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 51