We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2092
Details
Submitted by[?]: Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2093
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Progressive Conservative Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the 
Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Progressive Conservative Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Progressive Conservative Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Centrist Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Centrist Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Centrist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:25:45, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2092 |
| Message | I wouldve gone for the FFP just as easily as the BLP but the latter are more active and the FFP piss me off in RL. =P |
| Date | 00:43:43, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Hosengott Nationalists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2092 |
| Message | OOC: Agreed with the FFP comment i really dont know why though they just do. |
| Date | 01:42:05, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2092 |
| Message | Well we thank you for your consideration though we hope that was not the only reason you selected us. |
| Date | 12:13:33, August 10, 2005 CET | From | Family First Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2092 |
| Message | In opposition I will go...but no hard feelings in RL from our end. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 303 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 117 |
| Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature. |
| Random quote: "When I see a 9/11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, "Oh shut up" I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining." - Glenn Beck |